| Project Name | A.V. |
| Project Name | A.V. |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 167.9 | 111.8 | 102.0 | 86.6 | 78.1 | 66.3 | 57.0 | 54.8 | 52.4 | 31.8 | 24.4 | 21.6 |
| Cluster size | 357 | 241 | 217 | 197 | 174 | 128 | 174 | 184 | 111 | 121 | 36 | 60 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 2.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.21 | 7.63 | 6.80 | 8.61 | 7.44 | 5.37 | 4.79 | 5.78 | 8.73 | 5.20 | 11.10 | 5.05 |
| GDT_TS | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 1.57 | 2.55 | 1.63 | 7.78 | 4.05 | 4.21 | 2.58 | 6.22 | 5.36 | 5.73 |
| 2 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.78 | 3.24 | 8.60 | 4.64 | 4.50 | 3.71 | 6.50 | 6.21 | 5.11 |
| 3 | 1.57 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 2.21 | 7.72 | 3.61 | 3.79 | 3.29 | 6.11 | 6.13 | 4.86 |
| 4 | 2.55 | 2.78 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 8.74 | 5.10 | 4.70 | 1.80 | 7.01 | 4.69 | 6.45 |
| 5 | 1.63 | 3.24 | 2.21 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 7.99 | 4.09 | 3.80 | 2.12 | 5.96 | 4.86 | 5.82 |
| 6 | 7.78 | 8.60 | 7.72 | 8.74 | 7.99 | 0.00 | 5.53 | 6.49 | 8.66 | 5.09 | 10.90 | 6.80 |
| 7 | 4.05 | 4.64 | 3.61 | 5.10 | 4.09 | 5.53 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 5.13 | 4.02 | 8.27 | 2.94 |
| 8 | 4.21 | 4.50 | 3.79 | 4.70 | 3.80 | 6.49 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 4.62 | 4.32 | 7.48 | 3.19 |
| 9 | 2.58 | 3.71 | 3.29 | 1.80 | 2.12 | 8.66 | 5.13 | 4.62 | 0.00 | 6.62 | 4.03 | 6.74 |
| 10 | 6.22 | 6.50 | 6.11 | 7.01 | 5.96 | 5.09 | 4.02 | 4.32 | 6.62 | 0.00 | 8.87 | 4.96 |
| 11 | 5.36 | 6.21 | 6.13 | 4.69 | 4.86 | 10.90 | 8.27 | 7.48 | 4.03 | 8.87 | 0.00 | 9.76 |
| 12 | 5.73 | 5.11 | 4.86 | 6.45 | 5.82 | 6.80 | 2.94 | 3.19 | 6.74 | 4.96 | 9.76 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.70 |
| 2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.96 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 5 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.84 |
| 8 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.86 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.58 |
| 12 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013