| Project Name | Control6 |
| Project Name | Control6 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 157.0 | 89.0 | 79.0 | 58.3 | 58.0 | 53.2 | 45.3 | 44.6 | 40.5 | 40.2 | 39.4 | 21.2 |
| Cluster size | 350 | 237 | 207 | 186 | 195 | 128 | 134 | 145 | 140 | 121 | 100 | 57 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.56 | 2.80 | 5.43 | 4.87 | 3.16 | 2.88 | 5.57 | 4.56 | 3.68 | 6.14 | 7.43 | 7.07 |
| GDT_TS | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.46 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.15 | 4.98 | 4.27 | 2.01 | 1.80 | 4.89 | 3.79 | 3.54 | 5.46 | 7.17 | 6.96 |
| 2 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 4.51 | 4.29 | 2.16 | 1.86 | 4.33 | 3.81 | 3.69 | 5.09 | 6.72 | 6.64 |
| 3 | 4.98 | 4.51 | 0.00 | 5.76 | 4.79 | 4.96 | 1.50 | 4.95 | 5.13 | 5.46 | 5.21 | 4.61 |
| 4 | 4.27 | 4.29 | 5.76 | 0.00 | 4.43 | 4.86 | 5.82 | 4.92 | 2.75 | 2.82 | 5.53 | 5.45 |
| 5 | 2.01 | 2.16 | 4.79 | 4.43 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 4.84 | 2.44 | 4.07 | 5.27 | 6.66 | 6.60 |
| 6 | 1.80 | 1.86 | 4.96 | 4.86 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 4.40 | 3.64 | 5.90 | 7.50 | 7.25 |
| 7 | 4.89 | 4.33 | 1.50 | 5.82 | 4.84 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 5.05 | 5.20 | 5.45 | 5.06 | 4.55 |
| 8 | 3.79 | 3.81 | 4.95 | 4.92 | 2.44 | 4.40 | 5.05 | 0.00 | 4.54 | 5.01 | 5.96 | 6.30 |
| 9 | 3.54 | 3.69 | 5.13 | 2.75 | 4.07 | 3.64 | 5.20 | 4.54 | 0.00 | 4.35 | 6.03 | 5.73 |
| 10 | 5.46 | 5.09 | 5.46 | 2.82 | 5.27 | 5.90 | 5.45 | 5.01 | 4.35 | 0.00 | 4.41 | 4.73 |
| 11 | 7.17 | 6.72 | 5.21 | 5.53 | 6.66 | 7.50 | 5.06 | 5.96 | 6.03 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| 12 | 6.96 | 6.64 | 4.61 | 5.45 | 6.60 | 7.25 | 4.55 | 6.30 | 5.73 | 4.73 | 2.32 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.59 | 0.51 |
| 3 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.91 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| 4 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.52 |
| 5 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.56 | 0.50 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
| 7 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.91 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.53 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.54 |
| 11 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.82 |
| 12 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013