| Project Name | I28S |
| Project Name | I28S |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 435.5 | 394.4 | 376.7 | 252.1 | 226.2 | 129.1 | 118.6 | 93.0 | 71.6 | 65.4 | 44.3 | 31.0 |
| Cluster size | 333 | 313 | 323 | 247 | 236 | 113 | 127 | 105 | 62 | 62 | 46 | 33 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.56 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 3.21 | 2.63 | 1.88 | 2.47 | 3.23 | 4.53 | 2.73 |
| GDT_TS | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.79 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 2.73 | 1.78 | 0.92 | 1.63 | 2.84 | 3.94 | 2.26 |
| 2 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 2.63 | 1.71 | 1.19 | 1.72 | 2.96 | 3.73 | 2.48 |
| 3 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 2.76 | 1.60 | 0.90 | 1.70 | 2.67 | 3.85 | 2.13 |
| 4 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 2.59 | 1.69 | 1.16 | 1.57 | 2.72 | 3.77 | 2.22 |
| 5 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 1.66 | 1.14 | 1.60 | 2.82 | 3.74 | 2.34 |
| 6 | 2.73 | 2.63 | 2.76 | 2.59 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 2.87 | 2.64 | 3.88 | 2.22 | 3.61 |
| 7 | 1.78 | 1.71 | 1.60 | 1.69 | 1.66 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 2.16 | 2.09 | 3.94 | 2.09 |
| 8 | 0.92 | 1.19 | 0.90 | 1.16 | 1.14 | 2.87 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.62 | 4.00 | 2.04 |
| 9 | 1.63 | 1.72 | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.60 | 2.64 | 2.16 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 3.97 | 2.59 |
| 10 | 2.84 | 2.96 | 2.67 | 2.72 | 2.82 | 3.88 | 2.09 | 2.62 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 4.82 | 1.16 |
| 11 | 3.94 | 3.73 | 3.85 | 3.77 | 3.74 | 2.22 | 3.94 | 4.00 | 3.97 | 4.82 | 0.00 | 4.62 |
| 12 | 2.26 | 2.48 | 2.13 | 2.22 | 2.34 | 3.61 | 2.09 | 2.04 | 2.59 | 1.16 | 4.62 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.92 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.91 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.93 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.93 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.92 |
| 6 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| 8 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.91 |
| 9 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| 10 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.97 |
| 11 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013