| Project Name | KKKK |
| Project Name | KKKK |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 204.0 | 165.7 | 162.2 | 158.4 | 144.7 | 143.5 | 130.2 | 113.9 | 111.0 | 110.9 | 94.6 | 87.5 |
| Cluster size | 251 | 196 | 207 | 191 | 168 | 169 | 159 | 147 | 135 | 152 | 110 | 115 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.17 | 2.84 | 2.74 | 2.86 | 2.84 | 2.74 | 2.82 | 2.84 | 2.99 | 2.96 | 3.05 | 3.03 |
| GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.20 | 2.24 | 2.40 | 2.30 | 1.97 | 2.98 | 2.86 | 3.27 | 3.10 | 3.32 |
| 2 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.04 | 2.09 | 1.89 | 1.93 | 2.29 | 2.36 | 2.57 | 2.47 | 2.70 |
| 3 | 2.20 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.19 | 2.02 | 1.95 | 2.44 | 2.60 | 2.73 | 2.65 | 2.80 |
| 4 | 2.24 | 2.04 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 2.16 | 2.77 | 2.91 | 2.96 | 2.37 | 3.02 |
| 5 | 2.40 | 2.09 | 2.19 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 1.83 | 2.37 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.41 | 2.80 |
| 6 | 2.30 | 1.89 | 2.02 | 2.00 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.40 | 2.68 | 2.86 | 2.61 | 2.87 |
| 7 | 1.97 | 1.93 | 1.95 | 2.16 | 1.83 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 2.25 | 2.70 | 2.53 | 2.78 |
| 8 | 2.98 | 2.29 | 2.44 | 2.77 | 2.37 | 2.40 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.13 | 2.49 | 2.39 |
| 9 | 2.86 | 2.36 | 2.60 | 2.91 | 2.67 | 2.68 | 2.25 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.82 | 2.71 |
| 10 | 3.27 | 2.57 | 2.73 | 2.96 | 2.63 | 2.86 | 2.70 | 2.13 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.12 |
| 11 | 3.10 | 2.47 | 2.65 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.61 | 2.53 | 2.49 | 2.82 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.70 |
| 12 | 3.32 | 2.70 | 2.80 | 3.02 | 2.80 | 2.87 | 2.78 | 2.39 | 2.71 | 2.12 | 2.70 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.62 |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.63 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013