| Project Name | p12 |
| Project Name | p12 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 137.5 | 129.5 | 126.1 | 114.3 | 83.8 | 77.3 | 75.7 | 64.7 | 63.2 | 48.5 | 40.5 | 16.3 |
| Cluster size | 291 | 239 | 263 | 233 | 170 | 181 | 166 | 118 | 129 | 92 | 85 | 33 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.47 | 8.26 | 7.70 | 7.83 | 7.61 | 7.56 | 7.73 | 7.68 | 8.00 | 7.21 | 6.83 | 7.41 |
| GDT_TS | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.45 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.22 | 2.23 | 2.12 | 2.92 | 2.66 | 2.16 | 2.40 | 3.36 | 3.86 | 3.94 | 4.39 |
| 2 | 3.22 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.99 | 3.74 | 4.05 | 2.84 | 4.08 | 2.49 | 5.01 | 5.33 | 4.82 |
| 3 | 2.23 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 2.93 | 3.22 | 2.46 | 3.04 | 2.38 | 4.31 | 4.45 | 4.15 |
| 4 | 2.12 | 2.99 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 3.30 | 2.08 | 3.43 | 3.33 | 4.38 | 4.80 | 4.12 |
| 5 | 2.92 | 3.74 | 2.93 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.79 | 3.40 | 3.87 | 2.95 | 3.35 | 4.48 |
| 6 | 2.66 | 4.05 | 3.22 | 3.30 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 2.86 | 4.29 | 3.28 | 3.10 | 4.19 |
| 7 | 2.16 | 2.84 | 2.46 | 2.08 | 2.79 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 2.94 | 4.03 | 4.64 | 4.46 |
| 8 | 2.40 | 4.08 | 3.04 | 3.43 | 3.40 | 2.86 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 4.35 | 4.37 | 4.18 | 4.88 |
| 9 | 3.36 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 3.33 | 3.87 | 4.29 | 2.94 | 4.35 | 0.00 | 4.83 | 5.39 | 4.74 |
| 10 | 3.86 | 5.01 | 4.31 | 4.38 | 2.95 | 3.28 | 4.03 | 4.37 | 4.83 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 4.65 |
| 11 | 3.94 | 5.33 | 4.45 | 4.80 | 3.35 | 3.10 | 4.64 | 4.18 | 5.39 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 4.95 |
| 12 | 4.39 | 4.82 | 4.15 | 4.12 | 4.48 | 4.19 | 4.46 | 4.88 | 4.74 | 4.65 | 4.95 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.57 |
| 2 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.60 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.60 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.63 |
| 7 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| 9 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| 11 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| 12 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013