| Project Name | CHEM361HET3,2 |
| Project Name | CHEM361HET3,2 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 360.4 | 243.8 | 241.6 | 184.0 | 157.5 | 154.2 | 92.3 | 87.5 | 85.3 | 66.9 | 54.2 | 36.6 |
| Cluster size | 411 | 328 | 267 | 216 | 128 | 157 | 85 | 98 | 100 | 87 | 56 | 67 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.63 | 8.60 | 8.92 | 8.14 | 8.41 | 8.56 | 9.00 | 8.37 | 8.09 | 8.09 | 7.95 | 8.89 |
| GDT_TS | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 1.16 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 3.95 | 1.45 | 1.66 | 2.90 | 1.82 | 3.05 | 1.62 |
| 2 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 1.87 | 1.93 | 3.82 | 2.19 | 1.18 | 2.59 | 2.18 | 2.95 | 2.01 |
| 3 | 1.16 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 1.54 | 4.25 | 1.38 | 1.68 | 2.96 | 2.36 | 3.41 | 1.20 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 1.87 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.23 | 4.11 | 1.98 | 1.46 | 2.93 | 1.84 | 2.88 | 2.14 |
| 5 | 0.97 | 1.93 | 1.54 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 4.01 | 1.78 | 1.72 | 2.98 | 1.47 | 3.01 | 1.86 |
| 6 | 3.95 | 3.82 | 4.25 | 4.11 | 4.01 | 0.00 | 4.41 | 4.02 | 3.27 | 3.58 | 2.50 | 4.26 |
| 7 | 1.45 | 2.19 | 1.38 | 1.98 | 1.78 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 3.03 | 2.55 | 3.47 | 1.28 |
| 8 | 1.66 | 1.18 | 1.68 | 1.46 | 1.72 | 4.02 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.17 | 2.88 | 2.18 |
| 9 | 2.90 | 2.59 | 2.96 | 2.93 | 2.98 | 3.27 | 3.03 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.67 | 2.75 |
| 10 | 1.82 | 2.18 | 2.36 | 1.84 | 1.47 | 3.58 | 2.55 | 2.17 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.32 |
| 11 | 3.05 | 2.95 | 3.41 | 2.88 | 3.01 | 2.50 | 3.47 | 2.88 | 2.67 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 3.51 |
| 12 | 1.62 | 2.01 | 1.20 | 2.14 | 1.86 | 4.26 | 1.28 | 2.18 | 2.75 | 2.32 | 3.51 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.86 |
| 2 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| 3 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.91 |
| 4 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.81 |
| 5 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.85 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.78 |
| 7 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.88 |
| 8 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.79 |
| 10 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| 12 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013