| Project Name | 16b |
| Project Name | 16b |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 154.5 | 148.8 | 138.3 | 130.5 | 123.3 | 116.7 | 85.9 | 82.5 | 76.4 | 65.5 | 54.9 | 32.3 |
| Cluster size | 200 | 203 | 243 | 265 | 197 | 227 | 91 | 144 | 162 | 135 | 74 | 59 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.47 | 4.20 | 4.68 | 3.63 | 4.62 | 3.61 | 4.12 | 4.62 | 4.22 | 3.70 | 5.66 | 4.68 |
| GDT_TS | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.58 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 4.82 | 4.14 | 4.90 | 3.07 | 4.16 | 4.66 | 4.12 | 4.15 | 6.13 | 3.05 |
| 2 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 3.09 | 4.15 | 2.07 | 2.00 | 4.25 | 3.02 | 2.71 | 4.60 | 1.76 |
| 3 | 4.82 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 2.18 | 4.41 | 4.08 | 2.52 | 2.69 | 3.83 | 5.71 | 4.84 |
| 4 | 4.14 | 3.09 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 3.00 | 2.20 | 3.89 | 1.56 | 2.19 | 5.03 | 3.60 |
| 5 | 4.90 | 4.15 | 2.18 | 3.74 | 0.00 | 4.28 | 3.84 | 1.96 | 3.20 | 3.95 | 4.57 | 4.63 |
| 6 | 3.07 | 2.07 | 4.41 | 3.00 | 4.28 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 4.16 | 3.22 | 2.60 | 4.95 | 2.60 |
| 7 | 4.16 | 2.00 | 4.08 | 2.20 | 3.84 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 4.08 | 2.34 | 2.36 | 4.47 | 2.83 |
| 8 | 4.66 | 4.25 | 2.52 | 3.89 | 1.96 | 4.16 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 3.65 | 5.05 | 4.23 |
| 9 | 4.12 | 3.02 | 2.69 | 1.56 | 3.20 | 3.22 | 2.34 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 4.82 | 3.18 |
| 10 | 4.15 | 2.71 | 3.83 | 2.19 | 3.95 | 2.60 | 2.36 | 3.65 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 4.47 | 2.45 |
| 11 | 6.13 | 4.60 | 5.71 | 5.03 | 4.57 | 4.95 | 4.47 | 5.05 | 4.82 | 4.47 | 0.00 | 4.66 |
| 12 | 3.05 | 1.76 | 4.84 | 3.60 | 4.63 | 2.60 | 2.83 | 4.23 | 3.18 | 2.45 | 4.66 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.97 |
| 3 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.56 |
| 4 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.52 |
| 6 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.77 |
| 8 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.97 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013