Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 303.8 | 152.8 | 118.5 | 103.6 | 102.2 | 96.9 | 85.7 | 82.5 | 80.3 | 78.5 | 76.4 | 47.6 |
Cluster size | 423 | 243 | 183 | 163 | 164 | 143 | 132 | 117 | 143 | 110 | 105 | 74 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.71 | 3.55 | 3.09 | 3.42 | 3.51 | 3.06 | 3.25 | 3.52 | 2.91 | 3.63 | 3.50 | 3.31 |
GDT_TS | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.57 | 3.50 | 3.89 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.40 | 3.29 | 2.25 | 2.11 | 4.45 |
2 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 3.52 | 3.84 | 2.91 | 2.75 | 3.21 | 3.26 | 2.40 | 2.06 | 4.16 |
3 | 2.57 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 2.87 | 3.47 | 2.11 | 2.66 | 2.86 | 2.75 | 2.70 | 2.47 | 3.38 |
4 | 3.50 | 3.52 | 2.87 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.57 | 2.32 | 2.18 | 2.72 | 3.44 | 3.40 | 2.83 |
5 | 3.89 | 3.84 | 3.47 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 3.34 | 2.34 | 2.63 | 3.07 | 3.90 | 3.58 | 2.65 |
6 | 3.00 | 2.91 | 2.11 | 2.57 | 3.34 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 2.86 | 2.55 | 2.97 | 2.77 | 3.21 |
7 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 2.66 | 2.32 | 2.34 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 2.62 | 3.10 | 2.78 | 3.00 |
8 | 3.40 | 3.21 | 2.86 | 2.18 | 2.63 | 2.86 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 3.55 | 3.30 | 2.91 |
9 | 3.29 | 3.26 | 2.75 | 2.72 | 3.07 | 2.55 | 2.62 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 3.49 | 3.22 | 2.71 |
10 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 2.70 | 3.44 | 3.90 | 2.97 | 3.10 | 3.55 | 3.49 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 4.32 |
11 | 2.11 | 2.06 | 2.47 | 3.40 | 3.58 | 2.77 | 2.78 | 3.30 | 3.22 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 4.14 |
12 | 4.45 | 4.16 | 3.38 | 2.83 | 2.65 | 3.21 | 3.00 | 2.91 | 2.71 | 4.32 | 4.14 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.49 |
2 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.51 |
3 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
4 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.63 |
5 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.68 |
6 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.58 |
7 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.60 |
8 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.60 |
9 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.67 |
10 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.48 |
11 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.50 |
12 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013