Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 236.2 | 209.6 | 190.1 | 179.5 | 151.1 | 138.2 | 127.3 | 125.8 | 112.5 | 109.6 | 99.6 | 91.8 |
Cluster size | 271 | 251 | 232 | 195 | 161 | 144 | 135 | 155 | 141 | 115 | 105 | 95 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.77 | 2.72 | 2.55 | 3.03 | 2.51 | 2.57 | 2.39 | 2.50 | 2.60 | 2.76 | 2.63 | 2.67 |
GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.59 | 1.95 | 2.40 | 2.00 | 2.02 | 2.52 | 1.80 | 2.60 | 2.46 | 2.23 |
2 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 2.31 | 2.61 | 2.14 | 2.21 | 2.67 | 2.30 | 2.62 | 2.54 | 2.25 |
3 | 2.59 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 2.07 | 2.51 | 2.41 | 2.65 | 2.26 | 2.77 | 2.55 | 2.62 |
4 | 1.95 | 2.31 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.33 | 2.70 | 2.17 | 2.90 | 2.79 | 1.98 |
5 | 2.40 | 2.61 | 2.07 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.42 | 2.60 | 1.96 | 2.65 | 2.24 | 2.56 |
6 | 2.00 | 2.14 | 2.51 | 2.25 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 1.82 | 2.57 | 2.06 | 2.57 | 1.98 | 2.22 |
7 | 2.02 | 2.21 | 2.41 | 2.33 | 2.42 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.05 | 2.48 | 2.21 | 2.15 |
8 | 2.52 | 2.67 | 2.65 | 2.70 | 2.60 | 2.57 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 3.16 | 2.79 | 2.43 |
9 | 1.80 | 2.30 | 2.26 | 2.17 | 1.96 | 2.06 | 2.05 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 2.21 | 2.17 |
10 | 2.60 | 2.62 | 2.77 | 2.90 | 2.65 | 2.57 | 2.48 | 3.16 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 2.76 |
11 | 2.46 | 2.54 | 2.55 | 2.79 | 2.24 | 1.98 | 2.21 | 2.79 | 2.21 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2.58 |
12 | 2.23 | 2.25 | 2.62 | 1.98 | 2.56 | 2.22 | 2.15 | 2.43 | 2.17 | 2.76 | 2.58 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
3 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.76 |
5 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
6 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
7 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
8 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
9 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
10 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
11 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
12 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013