| Project Name | MKMUT65 |
| Project Name | MKMUT65 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 194.5 | 95.5 | 76.4 | 70.0 | 60.8 | 59.1 | 58.1 | 42.1 | 38.2 | 37.2 | 23.6 | 9.7 |
| Cluster size | 406 | 230 | 159 | 200 | 203 | 181 | 158 | 138 | 110 | 124 | 64 | 27 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.78 | 3.39 | 3.06 | 4.00 | 4.92 | 4.70 | 6.36 | 5.29 | 5.29 | 5.00 | 4.09 | 5.25 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 1.54 | 4.14 | 3.47 | 2.68 | 4.15 | 3.50 | 2.83 | 3.78 | 3.80 | 3.46 |
| 2 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.65 | 4.09 | 3.38 | 2.25 | 4.07 | 3.78 | 2.61 | 3.88 | 3.76 | 3.28 |
| 3 | 1.54 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 3.50 | 3.02 | 4.65 | 3.60 | 3.49 | 4.01 | 3.44 | 4.00 |
| 4 | 4.14 | 4.09 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 4.92 | 5.39 | 4.51 | 5.16 | 3.06 | 1.72 | 5.70 |
| 5 | 3.47 | 3.38 | 3.50 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 2.27 | 1.94 | 3.88 | 4.31 | 4.02 | 4.31 |
| 6 | 2.68 | 2.25 | 3.02 | 4.92 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 4.28 | 2.41 | 4.04 | 4.49 | 2.80 |
| 7 | 4.15 | 4.07 | 4.65 | 5.39 | 2.27 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 3.51 | 4.41 | 5.16 | 4.08 |
| 8 | 3.50 | 3.78 | 3.60 | 4.51 | 1.94 | 4.28 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 4.26 | 4.34 | 4.43 | 4.84 |
| 9 | 2.83 | 2.61 | 3.49 | 5.16 | 3.88 | 2.41 | 3.51 | 4.26 | 0.00 | 3.97 | 4.98 | 2.26 |
| 10 | 3.78 | 3.88 | 4.01 | 3.06 | 4.31 | 4.04 | 4.41 | 4.34 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 4.58 |
| 11 | 3.80 | 3.76 | 3.44 | 1.72 | 4.02 | 4.49 | 5.16 | 4.43 | 4.98 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 5.68 |
| 12 | 3.46 | 3.28 | 4.00 | 5.70 | 4.31 | 2.80 | 4.08 | 4.84 | 2.26 | 4.58 | 5.68 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.88 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.86 |
| 2 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.85 |
| 3 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.85 |
| 4 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.56 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.64 |
| 6 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.87 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.89 |
| 10 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.55 |
| 11 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| 12 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.89 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013