| Project Name | 137L-M |
| Project Name | 137L-M |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 105.2 | 99.3 | 81.1 | 75.4 | 71.9 | 70.2 | 65.9 | 53.5 | 41.3 | 37.4 | 33.2 | 30.6 |
| Cluster size | 235 | 247 | 225 | 183 | 212 | 183 | 182 | 153 | 120 | 103 | 80 | 77 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.33 | 4.71 | 5.75 | 3.24 | 6.29 | 5.82 | 3.79 | 6.10 | 5.59 | 6.72 | 5.16 | 3.49 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 3.66 | 1.26 | 4.78 | 3.60 | 2.14 | 4.30 | 3.59 | 5.28 | 4.38 | 1.63 |
| 2 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 2.64 | 3.71 | 2.91 | 2.44 | 3.58 | 1.61 | 3.84 | 3.80 | 2.70 |
| 3 | 3.66 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 3.81 | 3.17 | 2.53 | 3.02 | 2.73 | 2.06 | 3.69 | 4.88 | 3.44 |
| 4 | 1.26 | 2.64 | 3.81 | 0.00 | 4.98 | 3.81 | 2.27 | 4.51 | 3.46 | 5.21 | 3.92 | 1.84 |
| 5 | 4.78 | 3.71 | 3.17 | 4.98 | 0.00 | 4.48 | 3.45 | 2.93 | 3.13 | 2.23 | 4.66 | 4.75 |
| 6 | 3.60 | 2.91 | 2.53 | 3.81 | 4.48 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 2.83 | 2.84 | 4.55 | 4.94 | 3.57 |
| 7 | 2.14 | 2.44 | 3.02 | 2.27 | 3.45 | 3.74 | 0.00 | 3.66 | 2.75 | 3.95 | 3.71 | 2.38 |
| 8 | 4.30 | 3.58 | 2.73 | 4.51 | 2.93 | 2.83 | 3.66 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 3.11 | 4.67 | 4.04 |
| 9 | 3.59 | 1.61 | 2.06 | 3.46 | 3.13 | 2.84 | 2.75 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 3.73 | 3.33 |
| 10 | 5.28 | 3.84 | 3.69 | 5.21 | 2.23 | 4.55 | 3.95 | 3.11 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 5.26 |
| 11 | 4.38 | 3.80 | 4.88 | 3.92 | 4.66 | 4.94 | 3.71 | 4.67 | 3.73 | 3.75 | 0.00 | 4.44 |
| 12 | 1.63 | 2.70 | 3.44 | 1.84 | 4.75 | 3.57 | 2.38 | 4.04 | 3.33 | 5.26 | 4.44 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.90 |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.81 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.77 |
| 4 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.87 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.90 |
| 8 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.67 |
| 9 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.86 |
| 10 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013