| Project Name | 126 |
| Project Name | 126 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 216.8 | 213.9 | 201.3 | 171.9 | 139.8 | 112.8 | 108.3 | 93.7 | 91.9 | 67.8 | 66.4 | 49.1 |
| Cluster size | 290 | 269 | 263 | 211 | 207 | 148 | 146 | 121 | 109 | 93 | 87 | 56 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.54 | 4.88 | 4.10 | 4.36 | 4.31 | 3.90 | 4.26 | 4.35 | 4.16 | 3.38 | 3.91 | 4.01 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 2.52 | 2.13 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 1.64 | 2.26 | 3.14 | 3.23 | 2.30 | 2.73 |
| 2 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 2.48 | 2.16 | 3.30 | 2.01 | 2.04 | 2.67 | 3.72 | 2.32 | 3.11 |
| 3 | 2.52 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 1.97 | 2.38 | 2.53 | 2.92 | 2.14 | 3.13 | 2.60 | 2.09 |
| 4 | 2.13 | 2.48 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.89 | 2.34 | 2.52 | 2.78 | 3.36 | 1.78 | 2.92 |
| 5 | 2.18 | 2.16 | 1.97 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.03 | 2.33 | 2.17 | 2.88 | 2.33 | 2.15 |
| 6 | 2.46 | 3.30 | 2.38 | 2.89 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 3.09 | 2.94 | 2.20 | 2.78 | 1.97 |
| 7 | 1.64 | 2.01 | 2.53 | 2.34 | 2.03 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 2.72 | 3.10 | 2.34 | 2.79 |
| 8 | 2.26 | 2.04 | 2.92 | 2.52 | 2.33 | 3.09 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 3.44 | 2.35 | 3.24 |
| 9 | 3.14 | 2.67 | 2.14 | 2.78 | 2.17 | 2.94 | 2.72 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 3.53 | 2.82 | 2.51 |
| 10 | 3.23 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 3.36 | 2.88 | 2.20 | 3.10 | 3.44 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 2.97 |
| 11 | 2.30 | 2.32 | 2.60 | 1.78 | 2.33 | 2.78 | 2.34 | 2.35 | 2.82 | 2.96 | 0.00 | 2.85 |
| 12 | 2.73 | 3.11 | 2.09 | 2.92 | 2.15 | 1.97 | 2.79 | 3.24 | 2.51 | 2.97 | 2.85 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.81 |
| 4 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 12 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013