| Project Name | controlnwh |
| Project Name | controlnwh |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 156.7 | 128.3 | 119.2 | 115.9 | 113.7 | 109.8 | 65.7 | 60.2 | 54.4 | 42.9 | 25.3 | 18.4 |
| Cluster size | 223 | 285 | 302 | 275 | 192 | 207 | 103 | 97 | 140 | 79 | 66 | 31 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.94 | 4.10 | 3.93 | 3.88 | 4.49 | 3.31 | 3.82 | 3.81 | 4.32 | 2.43 | 5.11 | 4.62 |
| GDT_TS | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.48 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.65 | 2.79 | 4.27 | 1.42 | 3.61 | 4.71 | 3.69 | 1.99 | 4.86 | 3.08 | 1.77 |
| 2 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 3.22 | 0.95 | 2.38 | 5.24 | 2.46 | 0.99 | 3.86 | 2.69 | 2.54 |
| 3 | 2.79 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 3.48 | 2.07 | 1.73 | 5.15 | 2.40 | 1.73 | 3.59 | 1.93 | 3.02 |
| 4 | 4.27 | 3.22 | 3.48 | 0.00 | 3.43 | 2.39 | 4.83 | 1.60 | 3.21 | 3.33 | 3.38 | 5.11 |
| 5 | 1.42 | 0.95 | 2.07 | 3.43 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 5.10 | 2.56 | 1.11 | 4.44 | 2.50 | 2.32 |
| 6 | 3.61 | 2.38 | 1.73 | 2.39 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 5.40 | 1.80 | 2.08 | 2.50 | 2.18 | 4.06 |
| 7 | 4.71 | 5.24 | 5.15 | 4.83 | 5.10 | 5.40 | 0.00 | 5.67 | 5.45 | 4.53 | 5.21 | 4.51 |
| 8 | 3.69 | 2.46 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 2.56 | 1.80 | 5.67 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 3.38 | 2.69 | 4.23 |
| 9 | 1.99 | 0.99 | 1.73 | 3.21 | 1.11 | 2.08 | 5.45 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 4.02 | 2.21 | 2.98 |
| 10 | 4.86 | 3.86 | 3.59 | 3.33 | 4.44 | 2.50 | 4.53 | 3.38 | 4.02 | 0.00 | 4.26 | 4.66 |
| 11 | 3.08 | 2.69 | 1.93 | 3.38 | 2.50 | 2.18 | 5.21 | 2.69 | 2.21 | 4.26 | 0.00 | 3.67 |
| 12 | 1.77 | 2.54 | 3.02 | 5.11 | 2.32 | 4.06 | 4.51 | 4.23 | 2.98 | 4.66 | 3.67 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.83 |
| 2 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.64 |
| 5 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.58 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.52 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.62 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.51 |
| 11 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013