| Project Name | vv |
| Project Name | vv |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 195.2 | 189.4 | 175.3 | 137.6 | 135.4 | 129.9 | 127.1 | 122.6 | 119.1 | 95.1 | 92.9 | 89.5 |
| Cluster size | 248 | 222 | 224 | 167 | 178 | 165 | 161 | 153 | 168 | 109 | 106 | 99 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.96 | 3.44 | 3.02 | 3.70 | 3.30 | 3.21 | 2.97 | 3.22 | 3.32 | 3.41 | 2.92 | 3.01 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.62 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 1.86 | 2.95 | 2.28 | 2.47 | 2.11 | 2.30 | 2.90 | 2.64 | 2.10 | 2.35 |
| 2 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 1.91 | 2.48 | 2.05 | 2.91 | 3.06 | 2.06 | 2.06 | 2.91 | 2.24 |
| 3 | 1.86 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 2.06 | 2.57 | 2.24 | 2.05 | 2.91 | 2.60 | 1.75 | 2.42 |
| 4 | 2.95 | 1.91 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.27 | 3.02 | 3.18 | 2.52 | 2.23 | 3.17 | 2.20 |
| 5 | 2.28 | 2.48 | 2.06 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.33 | 2.26 | 2.36 | 2.04 | 2.38 | 2.29 |
| 6 | 2.47 | 2.05 | 2.57 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 3.01 | 2.11 | 2.31 | 2.73 | 2.15 |
| 7 | 2.11 | 2.91 | 2.24 | 3.02 | 2.33 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.83 | 2.77 | 2.44 | 2.54 |
| 8 | 2.30 | 3.06 | 2.05 | 3.18 | 2.26 | 3.01 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 2.71 | 2.35 | 2.80 |
| 9 | 2.90 | 2.06 | 2.91 | 2.52 | 2.36 | 2.11 | 2.83 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.98 | 2.38 |
| 10 | 2.64 | 2.06 | 2.60 | 2.23 | 2.04 | 2.31 | 2.77 | 2.71 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 2.05 |
| 11 | 2.10 | 2.91 | 1.75 | 3.17 | 2.38 | 2.73 | 2.44 | 2.35 | 2.98 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.69 |
| 12 | 2.35 | 2.24 | 2.42 | 2.20 | 2.29 | 2.15 | 2.54 | 2.80 | 2.38 | 2.05 | 2.69 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
| 9 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.79 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013