| Project Name | OBP3 |
| Project Name | OBP3 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 225.4 | 219.0 | 217.6 | 182.4 | 151.9 | 146.4 | 131.6 | 112.5 | 73.3 | 59.2 | 52.4 | 47.1 |
| Cluster size | 264 | 270 | 260 | 230 | 189 | 169 | 172 | 156 | 100 | 67 | 57 | 66 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.73 | 2.54 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 2.43 | 2.80 | 2.38 | 3.27 | 2.54 | 2.51 | 3.01 | 2.20 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 2.18 | 1.87 | 2.12 | 1.34 | 1.88 | 2.25 | 1.94 | 2.28 | 1.87 | 2.13 |
| 2 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 1.62 | 1.77 | 1.70 | 1.81 | 1.82 | 2.50 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 2.13 | 1.64 |
| 3 | 2.18 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 1.66 | 2.11 | 2.02 | 2.93 | 1.79 | 1.38 | 2.56 | 1.52 |
| 4 | 1.87 | 1.77 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 1.91 | 1.75 | 2.40 | 1.81 | 1.60 | 1.98 | 1.63 |
| 5 | 2.12 | 1.70 | 1.66 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 1.78 | 2.63 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 2.49 | 1.89 |
| 6 | 1.34 | 1.81 | 2.11 | 1.91 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 2.35 | 1.84 | 2.08 | 1.72 | 2.06 |
| 7 | 1.88 | 1.82 | 2.02 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 1.95 | 1.86 |
| 8 | 2.25 | 2.50 | 2.93 | 2.40 | 2.63 | 2.35 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 2.89 | 2.22 | 2.57 |
| 9 | 1.94 | 1.67 | 1.79 | 1.81 | 2.08 | 1.84 | 2.10 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 2.03 | 1.80 |
| 10 | 2.28 | 1.67 | 1.38 | 1.60 | 1.94 | 2.08 | 2.00 | 2.89 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 1.46 |
| 11 | 1.87 | 2.13 | 2.56 | 1.98 | 2.49 | 1.72 | 1.95 | 2.22 | 2.03 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
| 12 | 2.13 | 1.64 | 1.52 | 1.63 | 1.89 | 2.06 | 1.86 | 2.57 | 1.80 | 1.46 | 2.35 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| 4 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.83 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| 6 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| 8 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.86 |
| 11 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013