| Project Name | control5 |
| Project Name | control5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 174.9 | 133.4 | 95.6 | 90.0 | 60.1 | 51.5 | 51.4 | 47.3 | 37.8 | 37.5 | 18.1 |
| Cluster size | 391 | 337 | 233 | 251 | 118 | 132 | 161 | 126 | 68 | 118 | 65 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 3.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 3.98 | 4.63 | 4.07 | 4.54 | 7.33 | 4.98 | 5.02 | 7.08 | 7.38 | 5.12 | 6.99 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.51 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 1.82 | 2.40 | 6.34 | 2.99 | 3.02 | 5.77 | 7.68 | 3.49 | 5.42 |
| 2 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 3.05 | 5.80 | 2.46 | 2.81 | 5.17 | 7.12 | 2.85 | 4.79 |
| 3 | 1.82 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 7.04 | 3.59 | 3.35 | 6.60 | 8.18 | 4.24 | 6.15 |
| 4 | 2.40 | 3.05 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 5.55 | 2.49 | 2.35 | 4.90 | 7.63 | 3.07 | 4.87 |
| 5 | 6.34 | 5.80 | 7.04 | 5.55 | 0.00 | 4.49 | 4.89 | 2.03 | 5.76 | 4.40 | 3.14 |
| 6 | 2.99 | 2.46 | 3.59 | 2.49 | 4.49 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 3.64 | 6.57 | 2.07 | 4.09 |
| 7 | 3.02 | 2.81 | 3.35 | 2.35 | 4.89 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 4.44 | 7.11 | 3.29 | 4.42 |
| 8 | 5.77 | 5.17 | 6.60 | 4.90 | 2.03 | 3.64 | 4.44 | 0.00 | 6.02 | 3.65 | 3.09 |
| 9 | 7.68 | 7.12 | 8.18 | 7.63 | 5.76 | 6.57 | 7.11 | 6.02 | 0.00 | 6.55 | 5.34 |
| 10 | 3.49 | 2.85 | 4.24 | 3.07 | 4.40 | 2.07 | 3.29 | 3.65 | 6.55 | 0.00 | 4.38 |
| 11 | 5.42 | 4.79 | 6.15 | 4.87 | 3.14 | 4.09 | 4.42 | 3.09 | 5.34 | 4.38 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.63 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.81 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.61 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.86 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.57 |
| 10 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.86 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013