| Project Name | Tetherine69 |
| Project Name | Tetherine69 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 105.2 | 90.2 | 89.3 | 78.8 | 53.1 | 50.6 | 49.0 | 48.2 | 46.6 | 45.9 | 45.3 | 41.4 |
| Cluster size | 248 | 271 | 249 | 215 | 146 | 137 | 70 | 150 | 126 | 136 | 128 | 124 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.30 | 2.57 | 3.00 | 3.03 | 3.42 | 4.73 | 7.44 | 3.34 | 2.94 | 3.09 | 5.38 | 3.80 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 2.84 | 1.64 | 4.17 | 5.22 | 7.12 | 3.57 | 2.37 | 3.59 | 5.34 | 3.93 |
| 2 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.95 | 2.76 | 4.14 | 6.63 | 2.92 | 1.59 | 2.42 | 4.44 | 2.78 |
| 3 | 2.84 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.87 | 4.28 | 6.45 | 3.00 | 1.50 | 2.65 | 4.37 | 2.72 |
| 4 | 1.64 | 1.95 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 4.64 | 6.72 | 3.22 | 1.79 | 2.65 | 4.59 | 2.81 |
| 5 | 4.17 | 2.76 | 2.87 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 5.61 | 1.91 | 3.69 | 3.81 | 3.10 | 1.90 |
| 6 | 5.22 | 4.14 | 4.28 | 4.64 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 4.80 | 2.67 | 4.92 | 4.47 | 2.37 | 3.29 |
| 7 | 7.12 | 6.63 | 6.45 | 6.72 | 5.61 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 5.57 | 6.95 | 6.78 | 3.96 | 5.69 |
| 8 | 3.57 | 2.92 | 3.00 | 3.22 | 1.91 | 2.67 | 5.57 | 0.00 | 3.53 | 4.01 | 3.17 | 2.33 |
| 9 | 2.37 | 1.59 | 1.50 | 1.79 | 3.69 | 4.92 | 6.95 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 5.11 | 3.35 |
| 10 | 3.59 | 2.42 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 3.81 | 4.47 | 6.78 | 4.01 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 4.70 | 3.35 |
| 11 | 5.34 | 4.44 | 4.37 | 4.59 | 3.10 | 2.37 | 3.96 | 3.17 | 5.11 | 4.70 | 0.00 | 3.15 |
| 12 | 3.93 | 2.78 | 2.72 | 2.81 | 1.90 | 3.29 | 5.69 | 2.33 | 3.35 | 3.35 | 3.15 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.87 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.95 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
| 7 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| 8 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| 9 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.89 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.80 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| 12 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013