| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 179.5 | 166.3 | 126.2 | 115.4 | 108.4 | 100.9 | 85.1 | 65.3 | 54.8 | 54.0 | 53.3 | 49.4 |
| Cluster size | 292 | 288 | 226 | 207 | 159 | 193 | 122 | 140 | 100 | 106 | 98 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.27 | 6.05 | 6.19 | 6.31 | 6.84 | 5.24 | 5.55 | 6.81 | 5.75 | 4.77 | 7.36 | 6.86 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.39 | 3.39 | 3.24 | 2.38 | 3.71 | 3.73 | 2.44 | 2.29 | 3.54 | 3.83 |
| 2 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 3.51 | 2.33 | 3.60 | 4.54 | 4.11 | 3.15 | 2.77 | 2.91 | 4.06 |
| 3 | 2.39 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 2.33 | 3.21 | 4.30 | 3.82 | 2.60 | 2.70 | 2.71 | 3.69 |
| 4 | 3.39 | 3.51 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 3.34 | 3.08 | 2.47 | 2.98 | 3.51 | 3.85 | 2.91 |
| 5 | 3.24 | 2.33 | 2.33 | 3.35 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 4.66 | 4.01 | 3.27 | 3.25 | 2.68 | 3.48 |
| 6 | 2.38 | 3.60 | 3.21 | 3.34 | 4.05 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 3.03 | 2.62 | 3.01 | 4.05 | 3.49 |
| 7 | 3.71 | 4.54 | 4.30 | 3.08 | 4.66 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 3.53 | 5.14 | 3.27 |
| 8 | 3.73 | 4.11 | 3.82 | 2.47 | 4.01 | 3.03 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 4.01 | 3.95 | 3.07 |
| 9 | 2.44 | 3.15 | 2.60 | 2.98 | 3.27 | 2.62 | 3.11 | 3.09 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 3.63 | 3.52 |
| 10 | 2.29 | 2.77 | 2.70 | 3.51 | 3.25 | 3.01 | 3.53 | 4.01 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 4.11 |
| 11 | 3.54 | 2.91 | 2.71 | 3.85 | 2.68 | 4.05 | 5.14 | 3.95 | 3.63 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 3.98 |
| 12 | 3.83 | 4.06 | 3.69 | 2.91 | 3.48 | 3.49 | 3.27 | 3.07 | 3.52 | 4.11 | 3.98 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 3 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.80 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013