| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 264.0 | 223.2 | 161.8 | 150.6 | 101.0 | 94.4 | 88.9 | 83.4 | 67.3 | 62.8 | 62.2 | 32.7 |
| Cluster size | 317 | 334 | 227 | 176 | 166 | 167 | 128 | 133 | 83 | 95 | 110 | 64 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.08 | 6.86 | 6.73 | 6.44 | 4.06 | 5.78 | 5.87 | 4.24 | 5.85 | 7.81 | 6.49 | 5.55 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 2.95 | 2.14 | 5.50 | 5.77 | 3.61 | 5.14 | 7.27 | 5.36 | 5.49 | 5.99 |
| 2 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.16 | 4.74 | 4.68 | 2.47 | 4.57 | 5.86 | 3.84 | 4.26 | 4.80 |
| 3 | 2.95 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 4.58 | 4.50 | 2.48 | 4.44 | 5.52 | 3.80 | 4.18 | 4.50 |
| 4 | 2.14 | 2.16 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 4.61 | 4.97 | 2.76 | 4.45 | 6.17 | 4.53 | 4.73 | 4.95 |
| 5 | 5.50 | 4.74 | 4.58 | 4.61 | 0.00 | 3.39 | 3.62 | 1.98 | 3.71 | 5.11 | 3.79 | 3.01 |
| 6 | 5.77 | 4.68 | 4.50 | 4.97 | 3.39 | 0.00 | 3.86 | 3.67 | 3.17 | 4.17 | 2.60 | 2.14 |
| 7 | 3.61 | 2.47 | 2.48 | 2.76 | 3.62 | 3.86 | 0.00 | 3.53 | 4.79 | 3.74 | 3.41 | 3.71 |
| 8 | 5.14 | 4.57 | 4.44 | 4.45 | 1.98 | 3.67 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 4.17 | 5.24 | 3.90 | 3.40 |
| 9 | 7.27 | 5.86 | 5.52 | 6.17 | 3.71 | 3.17 | 4.79 | 4.17 | 0.00 | 4.53 | 3.62 | 2.48 |
| 10 | 5.36 | 3.84 | 3.80 | 4.53 | 5.11 | 4.17 | 3.74 | 5.24 | 4.53 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 4.14 |
| 11 | 5.49 | 4.26 | 4.18 | 4.73 | 3.79 | 2.60 | 3.41 | 3.90 | 3.62 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| 12 | 5.99 | 4.80 | 4.50 | 4.95 | 3.01 | 2.14 | 3.71 | 3.40 | 2.48 | 4.14 | 2.78 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| 7 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.82 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013