| Project Name | IT43 |
| Project Name | IT43 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 376.0 | 353.3 | 311.4 | 301.3 | 283.6 | 262.9 | 238.0 | 231.3 | 213.8 | 150.0 | 99.3 | 53.4 |
| Cluster size | 260 | 212 | 202 | 223 | 181 | 216 | 161 | 150 | 164 | 112 | 82 | 37 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.14 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.34 | 1.37 | 1.39 | 1.31 | 1.07 | 1.39 | 1.42 | 2.25 | 2.18 |
| GDT_TS | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 1.62 | 1.58 |
| 2 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 1.63 | 1.59 |
| 3 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 1.55 | 1.57 |
| 4 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 1.51 | 1.76 |
| 5 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.44 | 1.79 |
| 6 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.90 | 1.53 | 1.58 |
| 7 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.56 | 1.71 |
| 8 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 1.64 | 1.77 |
| 9 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 1.49 | 1.71 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 1.77 |
| 11 | 1.62 | 1.63 | 1.55 | 1.51 | 1.44 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.64 | 1.49 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| 12 | 1.58 | 1.59 | 1.57 | 1.76 | 1.79 | 1.58 | 1.71 | 1.77 | 1.71 | 1.77 | 2.13 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 |
| 5 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| 6 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| 7 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| 8 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| 9 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
| 10 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| 11 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.92 |
| 12 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013