| Project Name | nl |
| Project Name | nl |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 130.1 | 114.4 | 103.8 | 91.9 | 73.7 | 68.9 | 67.9 | 65.1 | 58.4 | 47.3 | 47.1 | 13.1 |
| Cluster size | 250 | 229 | 207 | 193 | 178 | 206 | 196 | 184 | 148 | 89 | 95 | 25 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.09 | 5.57 | 5.67 | 5.28 | 6.45 | 5.57 | 5.20 | 5.33 | 5.04 | 5.58 | 6.14 | 6.95 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 2.26 | 3.90 | 5.26 | 2.93 | 2.43 | 2.56 | 2.44 | 3.27 | 2.73 | 5.48 |
| 2 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 2.57 | 3.49 | 1.31 | 2.50 | 2.35 | 2.97 | 4.82 | 3.95 | 3.50 |
| 3 | 2.26 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 4.34 | 5.75 | 3.57 | 2.79 | 2.80 | 2.69 | 3.25 | 2.56 | 5.85 |
| 4 | 3.90 | 2.57 | 4.34 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 2.63 | 3.14 | 3.40 | 3.44 | 5.51 | 4.66 | 3.51 |
| 5 | 5.26 | 3.49 | 5.75 | 3.30 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 4.38 | 4.54 | 4.84 | 7.11 | 5.71 | 1.96 |
| 6 | 2.93 | 1.31 | 3.57 | 2.63 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.46 | 2.92 | 5.02 | 3.92 | 3.34 |
| 7 | 2.43 | 2.50 | 2.79 | 3.14 | 4.38 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 2.54 | 4.03 | 3.39 | 4.49 |
| 8 | 2.56 | 2.35 | 2.80 | 3.40 | 4.54 | 2.46 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 4.09 | 3.68 | 4.49 |
| 9 | 2.44 | 2.97 | 2.69 | 3.44 | 4.84 | 2.92 | 2.54 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 3.97 | 3.45 | 4.86 |
| 10 | 3.27 | 4.82 | 3.25 | 5.51 | 7.11 | 5.02 | 4.03 | 4.09 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 7.22 |
| 11 | 2.73 | 3.95 | 2.56 | 4.66 | 5.71 | 3.92 | 3.39 | 3.68 | 3.45 | 4.21 | 0.00 | 6.02 |
| 12 | 5.48 | 3.50 | 5.85 | 3.51 | 1.96 | 3.34 | 4.49 | 4.49 | 4.86 | 7.22 | 6.02 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.85 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.64 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013