Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 212.6 | 197.1 | 174.5 | 136.7 | 116.0 | 96.6 | 96.4 | 91.7 | 84.7 | 83.5 | 52.1 | 43.8 |
Cluster size | 303 | 289 | 242 | 198 | 174 | 138 | 141 | 136 | 134 | 121 | 67 | 57 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.22 | 2.94 | 2.96 | 2.62 | 3.01 | 2.65 | 2.83 | 3.10 | 2.91 | 3.30 | 3.30 | 3.45 |
GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.62 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.72 | 2.13 | 1.73 | 2.00 | 2.39 | 2.09 | 1.99 | 2.02 | 2.17 | 2.25 | 2.14 |
2 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 1.72 | 1.77 | 2.25 | 2.14 | 2.33 | 1.79 | 2.20 | 2.36 | 2.28 |
3 | 2.13 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.12 | 2.49 | 2.32 | 2.56 | 2.31 | 2.61 | 2.25 | 2.65 |
4 | 1.73 | 1.72 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 2.15 | 1.96 | 2.28 | 1.80 | 2.16 | 2.26 | 2.36 |
5 | 2.00 | 1.77 | 2.12 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.22 | 2.51 | 2.16 | 2.30 | 2.30 | 2.46 |
6 | 2.39 | 2.25 | 2.49 | 2.15 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.74 | 2.34 | 2.37 | 2.64 | 2.65 |
7 | 2.09 | 2.14 | 2.32 | 1.96 | 2.22 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.01 | 2.65 | 2.50 | 2.72 |
8 | 1.99 | 2.33 | 2.56 | 2.28 | 2.51 | 2.74 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.60 | 2.80 | 2.44 |
9 | 2.02 | 1.79 | 2.31 | 1.80 | 2.16 | 2.34 | 2.01 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.58 | 2.23 |
10 | 2.17 | 2.20 | 2.61 | 2.16 | 2.30 | 2.37 | 2.65 | 2.60 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.11 |
11 | 2.25 | 2.36 | 2.25 | 2.26 | 2.30 | 2.64 | 2.50 | 2.80 | 2.58 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.61 |
12 | 2.14 | 2.28 | 2.65 | 2.36 | 2.46 | 2.65 | 2.72 | 2.44 | 2.23 | 2.11 | 2.61 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
3 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
5 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
6 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
7 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
9 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
11 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
12 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013