| Project Name | mutation54RQ |
| Project Name | mutation54RQ |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 123.2 | 104.1 | 74.2 | 71.7 | 63.4 | 56.2 | 55.3 | 51.5 | 50.2 | 49.5 | 44.4 | 43.7 |
| Cluster size | 310 | 185 | 140 | 189 | 198 | 149 | 154 | 129 | 154 | 170 | 112 | 110 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.77 | 6.82 | 7.09 | 5.36 | 6.01 | 6.53 | 8.08 | 7.98 | 6.58 | 6.74 | 5.26 | 7.23 |
| GDT_TS | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 2.82 | 2.17 | 1.71 | 2.80 | 5.29 | 4.82 | 4.14 | 3.25 | 2.60 | 3.75 |
| 2 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 3.95 | 3.24 | 3.50 | 5.38 | 5.11 | 5.29 | 3.67 | 4.18 | 3.02 |
| 3 | 2.82 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 3.63 | 3.40 | 2.56 | 6.01 | 5.64 | 5.07 | 4.13 | 3.97 | 4.19 |
| 4 | 2.17 | 3.95 | 3.63 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.41 | 5.41 | 4.78 | 3.70 | 2.89 | 1.10 | 4.84 |
| 5 | 1.71 | 3.24 | 3.40 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 4.84 | 4.33 | 4.09 | 2.86 | 2.81 | 3.75 |
| 6 | 2.80 | 3.50 | 2.56 | 2.41 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 5.74 | 4.91 | 4.26 | 3.06 | 2.74 | 4.86 |
| 7 | 5.29 | 5.38 | 6.01 | 5.41 | 4.84 | 5.74 | 0.00 | 3.73 | 3.56 | 4.49 | 5.84 | 5.42 |
| 8 | 4.82 | 5.11 | 5.64 | 4.78 | 4.33 | 4.91 | 3.73 | 0.00 | 3.98 | 3.39 | 5.25 | 4.74 |
| 9 | 4.14 | 5.29 | 5.07 | 3.70 | 4.09 | 4.26 | 3.56 | 3.98 | 0.00 | 3.71 | 4.04 | 5.71 |
| 10 | 3.25 | 3.67 | 4.13 | 2.89 | 2.86 | 3.06 | 4.49 | 3.39 | 3.71 | 0.00 | 3.08 | 3.89 |
| 11 | 2.60 | 4.18 | 3.97 | 1.10 | 2.81 | 2.74 | 5.84 | 5.25 | 4.04 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 5.12 |
| 12 | 3.75 | 3.02 | 4.19 | 4.84 | 3.75 | 4.86 | 5.42 | 4.74 | 5.71 | 3.89 | 5.12 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.53 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| 5 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.64 |
| 7 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.46 |
| 8 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| 9 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.50 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.64 |
| 12 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013