Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 161.3 | 140.5 | 129.1 | 113.6 | 99.9 | 98.8 | 90.2 | 85.5 | 84.1 | 77.4 | 68.1 | 67.5 |
Cluster size | 297 | 257 | 219 | 207 | 162 | 126 | 133 | 141 | 161 | 110 | 90 | 97 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 5.14 | 4.84 | 4.97 | 5.13 | 4.52 | 6.82 | 6.38 | 5.91 | 6.10 | 4.83 | 5.40 | 4.69 |
GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 3.03 | 2.26 | 3.11 | 3.89 | 3.03 | 3.14 | 3.07 | 2.05 | 3.13 | 3.18 |
2 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 2.37 | 2.61 | 4.61 | 3.59 | 3.65 | 3.41 | 2.47 | 2.83 | 2.95 |
3 | 3.03 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 2.87 | 3.84 | 3.19 | 3.09 | 2.84 | 3.06 | 2.88 | 3.10 |
4 | 2.26 | 2.37 | 2.96 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 3.97 | 3.29 | 3.45 | 2.89 | 2.16 | 3.15 | 3.34 |
5 | 3.11 | 2.61 | 2.87 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 3.91 | 3.70 | 3.41 | 3.09 | 3.21 | 2.98 |
6 | 3.89 | 4.61 | 3.84 | 3.97 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.45 | 2.69 | 4.16 | 3.88 | 4.58 |
7 | 3.03 | 3.59 | 3.19 | 3.29 | 3.91 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.39 | 3.24 | 3.34 | 4.27 |
8 | 3.14 | 3.65 | 3.09 | 3.45 | 3.70 | 2.45 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 3.65 | 3.20 | 3.45 |
9 | 3.07 | 3.41 | 2.84 | 2.89 | 3.41 | 2.69 | 2.39 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 3.13 | 3.61 |
10 | 2.05 | 2.47 | 3.06 | 2.16 | 3.09 | 4.16 | 3.24 | 3.65 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 3.66 |
11 | 3.13 | 2.83 | 2.88 | 3.15 | 3.21 | 3.88 | 3.34 | 3.20 | 3.13 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 2.91 |
12 | 3.18 | 2.95 | 3.10 | 3.34 | 2.98 | 4.58 | 4.27 | 3.45 | 3.61 | 3.66 | 2.91 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.64 |
2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
3 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
4 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.66 |
5 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
6 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
7 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
8 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
9 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
10 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.62 |
11 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
12 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013