| Project Name | 129D/E |
| Project Name | 129D/E |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 173.3 | 160.7 | 118.2 | 116.6 | 115.5 | 99.0 | 75.0 | 72.3 | 71.1 | 49.1 | 39.6 | 35.9 |
| Cluster size | 352 | 224 | 207 | 228 | 254 | 140 | 102 | 180 | 86 | 91 | 73 | 63 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.32 | 5.50 | 5.27 | 5.96 | 5.45 | 7.49 | 5.50 | 5.47 | 5.90 | 5.31 | 5.98 | 6.30 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.47 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 1.40 | 2.29 | 3.09 | 5.87 | 3.26 | 1.93 | 4.80 | 2.28 | 2.62 | 4.07 |
| 2 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 2.10 | 3.93 | 6.91 | 3.72 | 1.87 | 5.62 | 2.95 | 2.06 | 4.90 |
| 3 | 1.40 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 3.18 | 6.04 | 3.57 | 2.12 | 4.94 | 1.95 | 2.81 | 4.25 |
| 4 | 2.29 | 2.10 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 3.52 | 6.63 | 2.97 | 2.38 | 5.27 | 3.35 | 3.04 | 4.83 |
| 5 | 3.09 | 3.93 | 3.18 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 4.27 | 3.90 | 3.75 | 3.97 | 2.82 | 4.49 | 3.95 |
| 6 | 5.87 | 6.91 | 6.04 | 6.63 | 4.27 | 0.00 | 6.11 | 6.46 | 3.60 | 5.44 | 7.05 | 3.83 |
| 7 | 3.26 | 3.72 | 3.57 | 2.97 | 3.90 | 6.11 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 5.14 | 4.12 | 4.12 | 4.45 |
| 8 | 1.93 | 1.87 | 2.12 | 2.38 | 3.75 | 6.46 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 5.24 | 2.88 | 1.59 | 4.23 |
| 9 | 4.80 | 5.62 | 4.94 | 5.27 | 3.97 | 3.60 | 5.14 | 5.24 | 0.00 | 4.91 | 5.69 | 2.57 |
| 10 | 2.28 | 2.95 | 1.95 | 3.35 | 2.82 | 5.44 | 4.12 | 2.88 | 4.91 | 0.00 | 3.68 | 4.26 |
| 11 | 2.62 | 2.06 | 2.81 | 3.04 | 4.49 | 7.05 | 4.12 | 1.59 | 5.69 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 4.66 |
| 12 | 4.07 | 4.90 | 4.25 | 4.83 | 3.95 | 3.83 | 4.45 | 4.23 | 2.57 | 4.26 | 4.66 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| 8 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.62 |
| 9 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.77 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.66 |
| 11 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013