Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 224.5 | 221.1 | 202.9 | 142.6 | 117.6 | 106.2 | 98.4 | 90.2 | 89.5 | 77.0 | 75.1 | 58.1 |
Cluster size | 301 | 295 | 283 | 193 | 158 | 146 | 127 | 113 | 112 | 108 | 88 | 76 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.63 | 3.82 | 3.90 | 3.55 | 3.75 | 3.31 | 3.88 | 3.80 | 3.58 | 3.51 | 3.38 | 3.45 |
GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.00 | 2.57 | 2.55 | 2.16 | 2.49 | 3.15 | 2.83 | 2.67 |
2 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 2.10 | 2.26 | 2.94 | 2.06 | 2.39 | 2.37 | 3.12 | 2.76 | 2.25 |
3 | 2.19 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.29 | 3.09 | 2.44 | 2.57 | 2.85 | 3.59 | 3.20 | 3.15 |
4 | 2.19 | 2.10 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.80 | 2.19 | 2.17 | 2.44 | 3.15 | 2.74 | 2.53 |
5 | 2.00 | 2.26 | 2.29 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 2.36 | 2.26 | 2.37 | 3.08 | 2.84 | 2.49 |
6 | 2.57 | 2.94 | 3.09 | 2.80 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 3.02 | 2.33 | 2.68 | 2.31 | 2.53 |
7 | 2.55 | 2.06 | 2.44 | 2.19 | 2.36 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.50 | 3.33 | 3.00 | 2.64 |
8 | 2.16 | 2.39 | 2.57 | 2.17 | 2.26 | 3.02 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 3.43 | 3.18 | 2.69 |
9 | 2.49 | 2.37 | 2.85 | 2.44 | 2.37 | 2.33 | 2.50 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 2.43 | 2.06 |
10 | 3.15 | 3.12 | 3.59 | 3.15 | 3.08 | 2.68 | 3.33 | 3.43 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.56 |
11 | 2.83 | 2.76 | 3.20 | 2.74 | 2.84 | 2.31 | 3.00 | 3.18 | 2.43 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.37 |
12 | 2.67 | 2.25 | 3.15 | 2.53 | 2.49 | 2.53 | 2.64 | 2.69 | 2.06 | 2.56 | 2.37 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.65 |
2 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
3 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
4 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.70 |
5 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
7 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.68 |
8 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.68 |
9 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.76 |
10 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
11 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
12 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013