| Project Name | group3mutation1HET |
| Project Name | group3mutation1HET |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 386.4 | 322.2 | 298.4 | 180.0 | 177.2 | 141.5 | 105.6 | 103.1 | 88.5 | 73.3 | 65.5 | 62.0 |
| Cluster size | 345 | 301 | 275 | 204 | 188 | 157 | 127 | 100 | 95 | 85 | 62 | 61 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.72 | 1.69 | 1.93 | 2.02 | 1.77 | 2.43 | 2.77 | 2.45 | 1.73 | 1.60 | 2.26 | 3.02 |
| GDT_TS | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.77 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 1.09 | 1.60 | 1.89 | 2.23 | 1.58 | 0.78 | 1.64 | 2.82 |
| 2 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 1.52 | 1.81 | 1.90 | 1.27 | 0.48 | 1.47 | 2.54 |
| 3 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 1.23 | 1.66 | 1.89 | 2.10 | 1.60 | 0.92 | 1.68 | 2.68 |
| 4 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 1.25 | 1.55 | 2.04 | 1.53 | 0.89 | 1.58 | 2.59 |
| 5 | 1.09 | 0.85 | 1.23 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.24 | 1.68 | 1.90 | 1.20 | 0.97 | 1.67 | 2.56 |
| 6 | 1.60 | 1.52 | 1.66 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 2.04 | 1.84 | 1.54 | 2.09 | 2.13 |
| 7 | 1.89 | 1.81 | 1.89 | 1.55 | 1.68 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.22 | 1.77 | 2.36 | 1.85 |
| 8 | 2.23 | 1.90 | 2.10 | 2.04 | 1.90 | 2.04 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 1.90 | 2.39 | 1.26 |
| 9 | 1.58 | 1.27 | 1.60 | 1.53 | 1.20 | 1.84 | 2.22 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 1.29 | 1.76 | 2.60 |
| 10 | 0.78 | 0.48 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 1.54 | 1.77 | 1.90 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.60 | 2.45 |
| 11 | 1.64 | 1.47 | 1.68 | 1.58 | 1.67 | 2.09 | 2.36 | 2.39 | 1.76 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 2.83 |
| 12 | 2.82 | 2.54 | 2.68 | 2.59 | 2.56 | 2.13 | 1.85 | 1.26 | 2.60 | 2.45 | 2.83 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.91 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.90 |
| 4 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| 5 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| 6 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| 7 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| 8 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.94 |
| 9 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| 10 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| 11 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| 12 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013