Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 155.1 | 145.7 | 132.4 | 111.3 | 105.1 | 99.9 | 96.1 | 91.0 | 68.0 | 54.9 | 48.9 | 27.4 |
Cluster size | 287 | 234 | 210 | 187 | 198 | 165 | 176 | 175 | 117 | 101 | 105 | 45 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 6.09 | 5.65 | 6.85 | 4.70 | 5.58 | 5.40 | 4.96 | 4.73 | 5.90 | 5.49 | 6.42 | 5.25 |
GDT_TS | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.50 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 3.96 | 5.09 | 5.03 | 3.11 | 5.78 | 5.03 | 2.74 | 3.98 | 4.38 | 5.57 |
2 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 4.09 | 4.63 | 4.53 | 2.77 | 5.35 | 4.26 | 2.97 | 3.84 | 4.00 | 4.91 |
3 | 3.96 | 4.09 | 0.00 | 5.86 | 6.40 | 3.10 | 6.84 | 5.00 | 3.07 | 2.82 | 6.00 | 5.65 |
4 | 5.09 | 4.63 | 5.86 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 4.50 | 3.22 | 2.84 | 4.88 | 4.46 | 5.05 | 4.45 |
5 | 5.03 | 4.53 | 6.40 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 5.16 | 3.41 | 4.25 | 5.36 | 5.39 | 4.23 | 4.90 |
6 | 3.11 | 2.77 | 3.10 | 4.50 | 5.16 | 0.00 | 5.51 | 3.78 | 2.61 | 2.81 | 5.09 | 4.87 |
7 | 5.78 | 5.35 | 6.84 | 3.22 | 3.41 | 5.51 | 0.00 | 4.54 | 5.67 | 5.74 | 5.88 | 5.12 |
8 | 5.03 | 4.26 | 5.00 | 2.84 | 4.25 | 3.78 | 4.54 | 0.00 | 4.45 | 3.59 | 5.15 | 3.85 |
9 | 2.74 | 2.97 | 3.07 | 4.88 | 5.36 | 2.61 | 5.67 | 4.45 | 0.00 | 3.04 | 5.07 | 5.20 |
10 | 3.98 | 3.84 | 2.82 | 4.46 | 5.39 | 2.81 | 5.74 | 3.59 | 3.04 | 0.00 | 5.32 | 4.83 |
11 | 4.38 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.05 | 4.23 | 5.09 | 5.88 | 5.15 | 5.07 | 5.32 | 0.00 | 4.95 |
12 | 5.57 | 4.91 | 5.65 | 4.45 | 4.90 | 4.87 | 5.12 | 3.85 | 5.20 | 4.83 | 4.95 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.52 |
2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
3 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.53 |
4 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.58 |
6 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.53 |
7 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.55 |
8 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.59 |
9 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.53 |
10 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.56 |
11 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
12 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013