| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 252.3 | 205.9 | 177.5 | 175.9 | 171.2 | 148.3 | 109.3 | 96.5 | 78.0 | 46.6 | 43.8 | 24.4 |
| Cluster size | 359 | 279 | 200 | 217 | 238 | 182 | 141 | 123 | 104 | 58 | 60 | 39 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.35 | 6.98 | 7.11 | 13.80 | 6.51 | 7.84 | 7.81 | 6.64 | 7.18 | 6.14 | 6.84 | 6.22 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.38 | 12.00 | 2.39 | 2.97 | 3.01 | 2.71 | 3.45 | 3.91 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| 2 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 12.20 | 2.29 | 2.63 | 2.75 | 2.85 | 3.69 | 4.55 | 3.52 | 3.85 |
| 3 | 2.38 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 11.70 | 1.95 | 2.50 | 2.55 | 2.90 | 3.56 | 4.37 | 3.29 | 3.79 |
| 4 | 12.00 | 12.20 | 11.70 | 0.00 | 11.80 | 12.00 | 11.80 | 12.00 | 12.40 | 12.60 | 12.30 | 12.20 |
| 5 | 2.39 | 2.29 | 1.95 | 11.80 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 3.02 | 3.07 | 3.71 | 4.46 | 3.59 | 4.00 |
| 6 | 2.97 | 2.63 | 2.50 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 2.47 | 3.13 | 4.02 | 2.80 | 3.38 |
| 7 | 3.01 | 2.75 | 2.55 | 11.80 | 3.02 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 3.14 | 4.07 | 2.76 | 3.53 |
| 8 | 2.71 | 2.85 | 2.90 | 12.00 | 3.07 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 3.24 | 2.12 | 2.66 |
| 9 | 3.45 | 3.69 | 3.56 | 12.40 | 3.71 | 3.13 | 3.14 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.63 | 3.14 |
| 10 | 3.91 | 4.55 | 4.37 | 12.60 | 4.46 | 4.02 | 4.07 | 3.24 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 2.63 |
| 11 | 3.18 | 3.52 | 3.29 | 12.30 | 3.59 | 2.80 | 2.76 | 2.12 | 2.63 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.46 |
| 12 | 3.42 | 3.85 | 3.79 | 12.20 | 4.00 | 3.38 | 3.53 | 2.66 | 3.14 | 2.63 | 2.46 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.58 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| 7 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.80 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.81 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013