| Project Name | v5s5 |
| Project Name | v5s5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 118.9 | 98.3 | 94.9 | 86.3 | 80.0 | 75.9 | 70.1 | 63.8 | 63.2 | 63.1 | 60.2 | 47.8 |
| Cluster size | 248 | 199 | 188 | 206 | 182 | 167 | 151 | 145 | 141 | 138 | 140 | 95 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.98 | 2.43 | 2.84 | 3.92 | 2.91 | 3.25 | 2.17 | 2.78 | 2.15 | 2.62 | 2.96 | 2.75 |
| GDT_TS | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 3.27 | 3.65 | 2.85 | 3.39 | 2.01 | 2.70 | 2.32 | 2.70 | 3.63 | 2.96 |
| 2 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 5.02 | 2.61 | 4.49 | 2.67 | 3.34 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 4.48 | 3.79 |
| 3 | 3.27 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 5.22 | 3.37 | 4.30 | 3.34 | 3.38 | 3.67 | 3.07 | 4.17 | 3.90 |
| 4 | 3.65 | 5.02 | 5.22 | 0.00 | 4.32 | 3.30 | 3.75 | 3.27 | 3.65 | 4.49 | 3.90 | 3.94 |
| 5 | 2.85 | 2.61 | 3.37 | 4.32 | 0.00 | 4.28 | 3.27 | 2.98 | 2.70 | 3.88 | 3.99 | 3.47 |
| 6 | 3.39 | 4.49 | 4.30 | 3.30 | 4.28 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 3.07 | 3.34 | 2.89 | 3.01 | 3.36 |
| 7 | 2.01 | 2.67 | 3.34 | 3.75 | 3.27 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 2.99 | 2.83 | 3.90 | 3.32 |
| 8 | 2.70 | 3.34 | 3.38 | 3.27 | 2.98 | 3.07 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 3.48 | 2.89 | 2.83 |
| 9 | 2.32 | 3.15 | 3.67 | 3.65 | 2.70 | 3.34 | 2.99 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 2.67 | 2.48 |
| 10 | 2.70 | 3.15 | 3.07 | 4.49 | 3.88 | 2.89 | 2.83 | 3.48 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 3.38 |
| 11 | 3.63 | 4.48 | 4.17 | 3.90 | 3.99 | 3.01 | 3.90 | 2.89 | 2.67 | 3.62 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
| 12 | 2.96 | 3.79 | 3.90 | 3.94 | 3.47 | 3.36 | 3.32 | 2.83 | 2.48 | 3.38 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.66 |
| 2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.60 |
| 3 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.61 |
| 4 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| 5 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| 7 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.63 |
| 9 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
| 11 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013