| Project Name | Aldo_Test |
| Project Name | Aldo_Test |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 181.4 | 142.4 | 134.2 | 133.0 | 128.8 | 111.8 | 104.8 | 102.0 | 95.8 | 91.8 | 78.2 | 76.6 |
| Cluster size | 257 | 210 | 186 | 202 | 194 | 165 | 141 | 140 | 155 | 135 | 108 | 107 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.39 | 2.40 | 2.90 | 2.60 | 2.62 | 2.38 | 2.25 | 2.91 | 2.27 | 2.24 | 2.57 | 2.71 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.56 | 2.08 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 2.37 | 3.12 | 2.04 | 2.60 | 2.80 | 2.12 |
| 2 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.81 | 2.14 | 1.59 | 2.08 | 3.05 | 1.79 | 2.47 | 2.78 | 2.46 |
| 3 | 2.56 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 2.36 | 2.14 | 2.44 | 3.39 | 2.27 | 3.18 | 3.39 | 3.08 |
| 4 | 2.08 | 1.81 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 1.83 | 1.90 | 2.56 | 2.12 | 2.48 | 2.63 | 2.67 |
| 5 | 2.36 | 2.14 | 2.36 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 2.44 | 3.25 | 1.92 | 2.68 | 3.14 | 2.86 |
| 6 | 2.18 | 1.59 | 2.14 | 1.83 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.73 | 1.92 | 2.35 | 2.68 | 2.50 |
| 7 | 2.37 | 2.08 | 2.44 | 1.90 | 2.44 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 1.79 | 1.82 | 2.25 | 2.69 |
| 8 | 3.12 | 3.05 | 3.39 | 2.56 | 3.25 | 2.73 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 3.15 | 2.35 | 1.91 | 3.47 |
| 9 | 2.04 | 1.79 | 2.27 | 2.12 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.79 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.75 | 2.50 |
| 10 | 2.60 | 2.47 | 3.18 | 2.48 | 2.68 | 2.35 | 1.82 | 2.35 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 3.00 |
| 11 | 2.80 | 2.78 | 3.39 | 2.63 | 3.14 | 2.68 | 2.25 | 1.91 | 2.75 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 3.09 |
| 12 | 2.12 | 2.46 | 3.08 | 2.67 | 2.86 | 2.50 | 2.69 | 3.47 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 3.09 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.77 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.65 |
| 4 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| 11 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.61 |
| 12 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013