| Project Name | TK |
| Project Name | TK |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 270.5 | 240.2 | 215.0 | 177.2 | 157.6 | 142.3 | 109.9 | 105.6 | 93.3 | 88.5 | 77.5 | 55.9 |
| Cluster size | 284 | 299 | 237 | 221 | 178 | 177 | 108 | 121 | 113 | 98 | 98 | 66 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.09 | 2.96 | 3.24 | 2.71 | 3.01 | 2.63 | 2.72 | 2.94 | 2.70 | 2.80 | 2.90 | 2.44 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 1.46 | 2.39 | 1.96 | 2.00 | 1.74 | 2.16 | 2.03 | 2.49 | 2.21 | 2.68 |
| 2 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.44 | 1.95 | 2.24 | 2.24 | 2.14 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.02 | 2.58 |
| 3 | 1.46 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.09 | 2.17 | 2.10 | 1.94 | 2.02 | 2.38 | 2.05 | 2.71 |
| 4 | 2.39 | 2.44 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.43 | 2.33 | 2.37 | 2.47 | 2.07 | 2.02 | 2.62 |
| 5 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 2.09 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.26 | 2.32 | 2.14 | 2.26 | 2.15 | 2.77 |
| 6 | 2.00 | 2.24 | 2.17 | 2.43 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.12 | 1.60 | 2.58 | 2.44 | 2.16 |
| 7 | 1.74 | 2.24 | 2.10 | 2.33 | 2.26 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 1.94 | 2.66 | 2.35 | 2.37 |
| 8 | 2.16 | 2.14 | 1.94 | 2.37 | 2.32 | 2.12 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 2.33 | 1.87 | 2.52 |
| 9 | 2.03 | 2.07 | 2.02 | 2.47 | 2.14 | 1.60 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.08 | 2.41 |
| 10 | 2.49 | 2.07 | 2.38 | 2.07 | 2.26 | 2.58 | 2.66 | 2.33 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 2.72 |
| 11 | 2.21 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 2.15 | 2.44 | 2.35 | 1.87 | 2.08 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.63 |
| 12 | 2.68 | 2.58 | 2.71 | 2.62 | 2.77 | 2.16 | 2.37 | 2.52 | 2.41 | 2.72 | 2.63 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.65 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.75 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| 8 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.70 |
| 9 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.67 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013