| Project Name | 18 |
| Project Name | 18 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 402.1 | 394.1 | 364.5 | 362.3 | 307.1 | 305.1 | 285.0 | 122.2 | 110.5 | 95.4 | 73.7 | 57.4 |
| Cluster size | 251 | 263 | 243 | 239 | 220 | 236 | 181 | 98 | 70 | 71 | 66 | 62 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 0.52 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 1.75 | 1.67 | 0.58 | 1.94 | 2.55 |
| GDT_TS | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 0.48 | 1.72 | 2.60 |
| 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 1.56 | 1.52 | 0.62 | 1.61 | 2.66 |
| 3 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 1.70 | 1.47 | 0.72 | 1.58 | 2.72 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 1.72 | 1.49 | 0.58 | 1.65 | 2.70 |
| 5 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 0.64 | 1.67 | 2.50 |
| 6 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 1.73 | 1.50 | 0.82 | 1.63 | 2.75 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 1.53 | 0.89 | 1.66 | 2.92 |
| 8 | 1.61 | 1.56 | 1.70 | 1.72 | 1.50 | 1.73 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 1.59 | 2.14 | 2.28 |
| 9 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.60 | 1.50 | 1.53 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 0.68 | 3.18 |
| 10 | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 1.59 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 2.54 |
| 11 | 1.72 | 1.61 | 1.58 | 1.65 | 1.67 | 1.63 | 1.66 | 2.14 | 0.68 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 3.19 |
| 12 | 2.60 | 2.66 | 2.72 | 2.70 | 2.50 | 2.75 | 2.92 | 2.28 | 3.18 | 2.54 | 3.19 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.86 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.86 |
| 4 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.85 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.88 |
| 6 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.85 |
| 7 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| 8 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.85 |
| 9 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.80 |
| 10 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| 11 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.82 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013