| Project Name | galapAPO |
| Project Name | galapAPO |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 219.3 | 185.8 | 179.8 | 164.4 | 160.6 | 160.1 | 130.4 | 99.9 | 89.1 | 88.6 | 83.6 | 73.9 |
| Cluster size | 285 | 219 | 220 | 218 | 192 | 202 | 151 | 124 | 91 | 107 | 94 | 97 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.91 | 4.95 | 4.82 | 4.83 | 4.76 | 4.12 | 4.49 | 4.67 | 4.14 | 4.42 | 4.24 | 4.37 |
| GDT_TS | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 2.56 | 2.53 | 3.17 | 2.63 | 3.20 | 2.78 | 3.39 | 3.52 | 3.62 | 3.88 |
| 2 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 3.16 | 2.21 | 3.37 | 3.71 | 3.73 | 4.26 | 4.80 | 4.63 | 5.23 |
| 3 | 2.56 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 2.18 | 2.60 | 3.08 | 3.21 | 3.51 | 4.06 | 3.85 | 4.40 |
| 4 | 2.53 | 3.16 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 2.76 | 3.36 | 3.18 | 3.86 | 3.92 | 3.82 | 4.42 |
| 5 | 3.17 | 2.21 | 2.18 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 2.95 | 3.25 | 3.36 | 3.72 | 4.35 | 4.26 | 4.65 |
| 6 | 2.63 | 3.37 | 2.60 | 2.76 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.82 | 2.63 | 3.08 | 2.84 | 3.30 |
| 7 | 3.20 | 3.71 | 3.08 | 3.36 | 3.25 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 3.00 | 3.53 | 3.35 | 3.43 |
| 8 | 2.78 | 3.73 | 3.21 | 3.18 | 3.36 | 2.82 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 3.34 | 3.00 | 3.61 |
| 9 | 3.39 | 4.26 | 3.51 | 3.86 | 3.72 | 2.63 | 3.00 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 1.99 | 2.59 |
| 10 | 3.52 | 4.80 | 4.06 | 3.92 | 4.35 | 3.08 | 3.53 | 3.34 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 2.29 |
| 11 | 3.62 | 4.63 | 3.85 | 3.82 | 4.26 | 2.84 | 3.35 | 3.00 | 1.99 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.84 |
| 12 | 3.88 | 5.23 | 4.40 | 4.42 | 4.65 | 3.30 | 3.43 | 3.61 | 2.59 | 2.29 | 2.84 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.62 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.59 |
| 3 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.61 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.73 |
| 12 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013