| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 213.7 | 186.2 | 149.9 | 143.5 | 141.6 | 139.1 | 135.7 | 129.7 | 115.2 | 104.0 | 92.9 | 52.9 |
| Cluster size | 268 | 236 | 188 | 209 | 172 | 159 | 158 | 153 | 153 | 135 | 111 | 58 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.98 | 7.18 | 6.81 | 6.72 | 6.75 | 7.09 | 6.50 | 6.96 | 6.27 | 6.28 | 6.65 | 6.81 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 3.33 | 2.23 | 1.85 | 1.92 | 3.26 | 3.32 | 3.04 | 3.25 | 3.73 | 3.53 |
| 2 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 2.76 | 2.96 | 3.30 | 2.80 | 3.08 | 2.29 | 2.71 | 3.19 | 2.84 |
| 3 | 3.33 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 3.29 | 3.48 | 2.46 | 2.26 | 2.96 | 2.83 | 2.40 | 2.96 |
| 4 | 2.23 | 2.76 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.61 | 2.74 | 2.64 | 2.68 | 3.05 | 3.09 |
| 5 | 1.85 | 2.96 | 3.29 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 3.15 | 3.34 | 3.08 | 3.38 | 3.64 | 3.58 |
| 6 | 1.92 | 3.30 | 3.48 | 2.29 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 3.55 | 3.45 | 3.38 | 3.91 | 3.76 |
| 7 | 3.26 | 2.80 | 2.46 | 2.61 | 3.15 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 2.53 | 2.22 | 2.03 | 2.41 |
| 8 | 3.32 | 3.08 | 2.26 | 2.74 | 3.34 | 3.55 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 2.60 | 2.07 | 2.67 |
| 9 | 3.04 | 2.29 | 2.96 | 2.64 | 3.08 | 3.45 | 2.53 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.80 | 2.51 |
| 10 | 3.25 | 2.71 | 2.83 | 2.68 | 3.38 | 3.38 | 2.22 | 2.60 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 1.93 |
| 11 | 3.73 | 3.19 | 2.40 | 3.05 | 3.64 | 3.91 | 2.03 | 2.07 | 2.80 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 2.66 |
| 12 | 3.53 | 2.84 | 2.96 | 3.09 | 3.58 | 3.76 | 2.41 | 2.67 | 2.51 | 1.93 | 2.66 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013