| Project Name | mk0917 |
| Project Name | mk0917 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 182.3 | 179.4 | 177.4 | 155.8 | 152.7 | 139.1 | 138.1 | 110.9 | 107.6 | 101.5 | 101.4 | 38.7 |
| Cluster size | 224 | 238 | 233 | 164 | 195 | 180 | 172 | 137 | 145 | 132 | 131 | 49 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.66 | 2.27 | 2.53 | 2.47 | 2.54 | 2.28 | 2.63 | 2.22 | 1.87 | 2.54 | 2.62 | 2.13 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.77 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 1.66 | 1.85 | 2.09 | 1.94 | 1.95 | 2.01 | 2.30 | 1.90 | 1.79 | 2.21 |
| 2 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 1.64 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.88 | 1.81 | 1.74 | 1.84 | 1.57 | 1.92 | 1.91 |
| 3 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 1.82 | 1.92 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 2.12 | 1.74 | 1.83 | 1.92 |
| 4 | 1.85 | 1.91 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.12 | 1.85 | 2.26 | 2.33 | 2.16 | 2.03 | 1.92 |
| 5 | 2.09 | 1.91 | 1.82 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 2.32 | 1.93 | 2.05 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 2.08 |
| 6 | 1.94 | 1.88 | 1.92 | 2.12 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 1.91 | 1.88 | 1.91 | 2.00 | 2.02 |
| 7 | 1.95 | 1.81 | 1.83 | 1.85 | 2.32 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.46 | 2.17 | 2.07 | 2.08 |
| 8 | 2.01 | 1.74 | 1.81 | 2.26 | 1.93 | 1.91 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 1.85 | 1.92 |
| 9 | 2.30 | 1.84 | 2.12 | 2.33 | 2.05 | 1.88 | 2.46 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.27 | 1.95 |
| 10 | 1.90 | 1.57 | 1.74 | 2.16 | 1.69 | 1.91 | 2.17 | 1.75 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 2.19 |
| 11 | 1.79 | 1.92 | 1.83 | 2.03 | 2.05 | 2.00 | 2.07 | 1.85 | 2.27 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 2.22 |
| 12 | 2.21 | 1.91 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.08 | 2.02 | 2.08 | 1.92 | 1.95 | 2.19 | 2.22 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| 3 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| 4 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.77 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013