| Project Name | m7_1 |
| Project Name | m7_1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 251.0 | 188.8 | 173.1 | 156.0 | 132.9 | 130.9 | 123.6 | 107.4 | 96.8 | 93.8 | 86.6 | 78.6 |
| Cluster size | 325 | 232 | 199 | 204 | 165 | 143 | 154 | 149 | 120 | 113 | 104 | 92 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.51 | 3.21 | 4.45 | 2.98 | 4.22 | 4.23 | 3.38 | 2.87 | 3.34 | 3.96 | 3.72 | 3.68 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.53 | 2.49 | 2.59 | 2.76 | 2.59 | 3.35 | 2.18 | 2.75 | 2.45 | 2.18 |
| 2 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 2.23 | 3.18 | 3.37 | 2.07 | 2.86 | 2.10 | 3.10 | 2.49 | 2.85 |
| 3 | 2.53 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 2.12 | 2.25 | 3.41 | 4.39 | 2.90 | 2.69 | 3.11 | 2.36 |
| 4 | 2.49 | 2.23 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 3.58 | 2.45 | 2.67 | 2.33 | 3.55 | 2.66 | 2.88 |
| 5 | 2.59 | 3.18 | 2.12 | 3.30 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 3.38 | 3.90 | 2.84 | 2.35 | 3.14 | 2.21 |
| 6 | 2.76 | 3.37 | 2.25 | 3.58 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 4.26 | 2.98 | 2.51 | 3.08 | 2.46 |
| 7 | 2.59 | 2.07 | 3.41 | 2.45 | 3.38 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 2.29 | 3.30 | 2.75 | 2.77 |
| 8 | 3.35 | 2.86 | 4.39 | 2.67 | 3.90 | 4.26 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 3.85 | 3.45 | 3.59 |
| 9 | 2.18 | 2.10 | 2.90 | 2.33 | 2.84 | 2.98 | 2.29 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 2.40 | 2.45 |
| 10 | 2.75 | 3.10 | 2.69 | 3.55 | 2.35 | 2.51 | 3.30 | 3.85 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 3.22 | 2.55 |
| 11 | 2.45 | 2.49 | 3.11 | 2.66 | 3.14 | 3.08 | 2.75 | 3.45 | 2.40 | 3.22 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| 12 | 2.18 | 2.85 | 2.36 | 2.88 | 2.21 | 2.46 | 2.77 | 3.59 | 2.45 | 2.55 | 2.71 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| 8 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| 10 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.70 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013