| Project Name | 17 |
| Project Name | 17 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 393.5 | 294.3 | 294.1 | 260.5 | 239.2 | 228.2 | 158.8 | 144.5 | 136.8 | 136.3 | 115.9 | 113.1 |
| Cluster size | 302 | 206 | 218 | 206 | 186 | 178 | 118 | 140 | 127 | 121 | 105 | 93 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.40 | 3.41 | 3.13 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 3.39 | 2.89 | 2.79 | 2.87 | 2.07 | 2.09 | 3.21 |
| GDT_TS | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 1.99 | 3.19 | 2.56 | 1.83 | 2.17 | 1.12 | 1.37 | 2.27 | 3.55 | 0.99 |
| 2 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 2.47 | 1.96 | 0.57 | 1.10 | 1.94 | 1.84 | 2.16 | 3.07 | 2.05 |
| 3 | 1.99 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 1.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.71 | 1.76 | 1.83 | 2.66 | 2.17 |
| 4 | 3.19 | 2.47 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 2.50 | 1.90 | 2.47 | 2.24 | 1.29 | 1.03 | 3.28 |
| 5 | 2.56 | 1.96 | 1.72 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 1.57 | 1.93 | 1.60 | 0.92 | 1.52 | 2.66 |
| 6 | 1.83 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 2.50 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 1.76 | 1.70 | 2.10 | 3.05 | 1.98 |
| 7 | 2.17 | 1.10 | 0.72 | 1.90 | 1.57 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 1.78 | 1.63 | 2.30 | 2.31 |
| 8 | 1.12 | 1.94 | 1.71 | 2.47 | 1.93 | 1.76 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 1.45 | 2.72 | 1.52 |
| 9 | 1.37 | 1.84 | 1.76 | 2.24 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 1.78 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 2.70 | 1.64 |
| 10 | 2.27 | 2.16 | 1.83 | 1.29 | 0.92 | 2.10 | 1.63 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 2.39 |
| 11 | 3.55 | 3.07 | 2.66 | 1.03 | 1.52 | 3.05 | 2.30 | 2.72 | 2.70 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 3.59 |
| 12 | 0.99 | 2.05 | 2.17 | 3.28 | 2.66 | 1.98 | 2.31 | 1.52 | 1.64 | 2.39 | 3.59 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.95 |
| 2 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.85 |
| 3 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| 4 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| 5 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.80 |
| 6 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.85 |
| 7 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.80 |
| 8 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.85 |
| 9 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.87 |
| 10 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.84 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013