| Project Name | Geo71_11LNRFM5 |
| Project Name | Geo71_11LNRFM5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 209.4 | 196.1 | 160.4 | 139.7 | 139.1 | 130.1 | 126.9 | 123.3 | 122.4 | 93.1 | 70.5 | 42.4 |
| Cluster size | 285 | 276 | 209 | 172 | 178 | 158 | 160 | 157 | 152 | 116 | 86 | 51 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.21 | 3.19 | 3.16 | 3.26 | 3.48 | 2.81 | 3.02 | 3.26 | 4.07 | 4.39 | 2.89 | 2.86 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 2.50 | 2.32 | 2.39 | 2.20 | 2.98 | 2.37 | 3.49 | 3.44 | 2.21 | 3.04 |
| 2 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.30 | 2.53 | 2.24 | 2.49 | 2.37 | 3.36 | 3.53 | 2.23 | 2.90 |
| 3 | 2.50 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.27 | 2.16 | 2.38 | 2.73 | 3.25 | 3.20 | 2.13 | 2.43 |
| 4 | 2.32 | 2.30 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 2.34 | 2.80 | 2.06 | 3.76 | 3.75 | 2.43 | 3.06 |
| 5 | 2.39 | 2.53 | 2.27 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 2.75 | 3.13 | 2.52 | 2.33 | 2.65 |
| 6 | 2.20 | 2.24 | 2.16 | 2.34 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 2.55 | 3.34 | 3.41 | 1.84 | 2.51 |
| 7 | 2.98 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 2.80 | 2.67 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 3.15 | 3.31 | 2.54 | 2.85 |
| 8 | 2.37 | 2.37 | 2.73 | 2.06 | 2.75 | 2.55 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 3.92 | 3.63 | 2.61 | 3.20 |
| 9 | 3.49 | 3.36 | 3.25 | 3.76 | 3.13 | 3.34 | 3.15 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 3.59 | 3.31 | 3.53 |
| 10 | 3.44 | 3.53 | 3.20 | 3.75 | 2.52 | 3.41 | 3.31 | 3.63 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 3.15 | 3.62 |
| 11 | 2.21 | 2.23 | 2.13 | 2.43 | 2.33 | 1.84 | 2.54 | 2.61 | 3.31 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 2.36 |
| 12 | 3.04 | 2.90 | 2.43 | 3.06 | 2.65 | 2.51 | 2.85 | 3.20 | 3.53 | 3.62 | 2.36 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.64 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
| 8 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| 9 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
| 10 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.60 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013