Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 208.3 | 175.9 | 175.9 | 153.8 | 130.2 | 125.0 | 119.5 | 107.7 | 84.9 | 69.4 | 35.0 | 32.0 |
Cluster size | 292 | 259 | 256 | 197 | 178 | 186 | 181 | 162 | 111 | 95 | 40 | 43 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.92 | 3.11 | 3.09 | 3.19 | 2.95 | 3.33 | 3.05 | 3.14 | 3.22 | 2.80 | 2.94 | 2.44 |
GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 1.84 | 1.92 | 1.96 | 2.17 | 1.95 | 1.70 | 2.36 | 2.15 | 2.54 | 2.36 |
2 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 1.86 | 2.08 | 2.37 | 2.35 | 1.75 | 2.55 | 2.05 | 2.55 | 2.32 |
3 | 1.84 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 1.67 | 2.35 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.31 | 2.34 | 2.58 | 2.62 |
4 | 1.92 | 1.86 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.49 | 2.36 | 1.87 | 2.19 | 2.14 | 2.79 | 2.43 |
5 | 1.96 | 2.08 | 1.67 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.15 | 2.05 | 2.34 | 2.23 | 2.61 | 2.50 |
6 | 2.17 | 2.37 | 2.35 | 2.49 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.36 | 2.52 | 2.66 | 2.89 | 2.67 |
7 | 1.95 | 2.35 | 2.07 | 2.36 | 2.15 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.50 | 2.75 | 2.57 | 2.47 |
8 | 1.70 | 1.75 | 2.07 | 1.87 | 2.05 | 2.36 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.04 | 2.31 | 2.30 |
9 | 2.36 | 2.55 | 2.31 | 2.19 | 2.34 | 2.52 | 2.50 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 2.53 | 2.84 |
10 | 2.15 | 2.05 | 2.34 | 2.14 | 2.23 | 2.66 | 2.75 | 2.04 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.02 |
11 | 2.54 | 2.55 | 2.58 | 2.79 | 2.61 | 2.89 | 2.57 | 2.31 | 2.53 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.31 |
12 | 2.36 | 2.32 | 2.62 | 2.43 | 2.50 | 2.67 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 2.84 | 2.02 | 2.31 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
3 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
4 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.72 |
5 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
6 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
7 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
8 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
9 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 |
11 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013