| Project Name | T45A/HIV-1 |
| Project Name | T45A/HIV-1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 756.6 | 524.7 | 466.0 | 370.8 | 348.8 | 277.7 | 195.5 | 98.2 | 78.7 | 72.5 | 57.7 | 14.9 |
| Cluster size | 413 | 339 | 304 | 226 | 211 | 170 | 129 | 69 | 50 | 42 | 34 | 13 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.25 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 3.24 | 1.24 | 3.68 | 2.73 | 1.33 | 1.79 | 4.26 |
| GDT_TS | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.72 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 2.87 | 0.47 | 3.38 | 2.47 | 1.12 | 1.81 | 4.02 |
| 2 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 2.78 | 0.41 | 3.26 | 2.50 | 1.05 | 1.65 | 3.85 |
| 3 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 2.84 | 0.51 | 3.30 | 2.46 | 0.99 | 1.67 | 3.87 |
| 4 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 2.83 | 0.44 | 3.34 | 2.59 | 1.15 | 1.68 | 3.96 |
| 5 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 0.77 | 3.47 | 2.64 | 0.79 | 1.75 | 4.01 |
| 6 | 2.87 | 2.78 | 2.84 | 2.83 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 3.22 | 3.09 | 1.99 |
| 7 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 2.54 | 1.25 | 1.73 | 3.90 |
| 8 | 3.38 | 3.26 | 3.30 | 3.34 | 3.47 | 1.00 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 3.60 | 3.43 | 1.16 |
| 9 | 2.47 | 2.50 | 2.46 | 2.59 | 2.64 | 1.75 | 2.54 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 3.06 | 2.82 |
| 10 | 1.12 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 1.15 | 0.79 | 3.22 | 1.25 | 3.60 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 1.68 | 3.97 |
| 11 | 1.81 | 1.65 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.75 | 3.09 | 1.73 | 3.43 | 3.06 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 3.75 |
| 12 | 4.02 | 3.85 | 3.87 | 3.96 | 4.01 | 1.99 | 3.90 | 1.16 | 2.82 | 3.97 | 3.75 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.76 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.84 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.83 |
| 7 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| 8 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.92 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| 10 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.78 |
| 12 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013