| Project Name | Ma |
| Project Name | Ma |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 128.7 | 112.1 | 112.0 | 108.5 | 107.7 | 103.0 | 89.3 | 79.7 | 75.0 | 70.9 | 59.3 | 56.3 |
| Cluster size | 241 | 209 | 221 | 200 | 188 | 180 | 153 | 133 | 132 | 125 | 110 | 108 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.60 | 4.26 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 3.78 | 3.64 | 3.31 | 3.58 | 4.08 | 3.92 | 3.94 | 3.96 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 2.94 | 2.25 | 2.69 | 2.64 | 2.45 | 2.76 | 2.07 | 2.28 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 3.18 | 2.60 | 4.01 | 3.58 | 4.22 | 2.44 | 1.69 | 3.26 | 3.87 |
| 3 | 2.94 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.39 | 3.86 | 3.30 | 3.83 | 2.78 | 2.46 | 3.42 | 3.57 |
| 4 | 2.25 | 3.18 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 2.31 | 1.85 | 2.64 | 2.62 | 2.71 | 2.56 | 2.61 |
| 5 | 2.69 | 2.60 | 2.39 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 2.89 | 3.42 | 2.62 | 2.48 | 2.91 | 3.17 |
| 6 | 2.64 | 4.01 | 3.86 | 2.31 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 3.28 | 3.40 | 2.50 | 2.48 |
| 7 | 2.45 | 3.58 | 3.30 | 1.85 | 2.89 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.98 | 2.99 | 2.74 | 2.65 |
| 8 | 2.76 | 4.22 | 3.83 | 2.64 | 3.42 | 2.32 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.63 | 2.71 | 2.47 |
| 9 | 2.07 | 2.44 | 2.78 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 3.28 | 2.98 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 2.59 | 3.02 |
| 10 | 2.28 | 1.69 | 2.46 | 2.71 | 2.48 | 3.40 | 2.99 | 3.63 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 3.42 |
| 11 | 2.55 | 3.26 | 3.42 | 2.56 | 2.91 | 2.50 | 2.74 | 2.71 | 2.59 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
| 12 | 2.68 | 3.87 | 3.57 | 2.61 | 3.17 | 2.48 | 2.65 | 2.47 | 3.02 | 3.42 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 11 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013