| Project Name | EP_Georgia |
| Project Name | EP_Georgia |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 194.8 | 141.5 | 140.5 | 116.2 | 89.1 | 81.9 | 78.8 | 74.4 | 68.9 | 65.2 | 64.2 | 54.3 |
| Cluster size | 344 | 249 | 241 | 203 | 142 | 142 | 134 | 130 | 106 | 117 | 102 | 90 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.13 | 7.27 | 6.46 | 7.16 | 7.42 | 6.00 | 5.65 | 4.74 | 7.27 | 4.56 | 6.50 | 5.57 |
| GDT_TS | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.46 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 2.79 | 2.84 | 2.90 | 3.65 | 4.06 | 4.75 | 2.93 | 5.48 | 3.80 | 3.81 |
| 2 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 3.49 | 3.26 | 4.34 | 4.52 | 4.89 | 3.64 | 5.51 | 4.53 | 4.08 |
| 3 | 2.79 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 3.54 | 3.13 | 3.22 | 3.96 | 3.28 | 4.59 | 3.27 | 3.24 |
| 4 | 2.84 | 3.49 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 3.15 | 3.63 | 4.61 | 2.33 | 5.41 | 3.16 | 3.99 |
| 5 | 2.90 | 3.26 | 3.54 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 4.37 | 4.96 | 3.16 | 5.69 | 4.14 | 4.08 |
| 6 | 3.65 | 4.34 | 3.13 | 3.15 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 3.05 | 3.57 | 3.29 | 4.30 | 2.53 | 3.10 |
| 7 | 4.06 | 4.52 | 3.22 | 3.63 | 4.37 | 3.05 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 3.87 | 3.97 | 3.22 | 3.17 |
| 8 | 4.75 | 4.89 | 3.96 | 4.61 | 4.96 | 3.57 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 4.79 | 2.97 | 4.10 | 3.15 |
| 9 | 2.93 | 3.64 | 3.28 | 2.33 | 3.16 | 3.29 | 3.87 | 4.79 | 0.00 | 5.60 | 3.41 | 4.24 |
| 10 | 5.48 | 5.51 | 4.59 | 5.41 | 5.69 | 4.30 | 3.97 | 2.97 | 5.60 | 0.00 | 4.96 | 3.67 |
| 11 | 3.80 | 4.53 | 3.27 | 3.16 | 4.14 | 2.53 | 3.22 | 4.10 | 3.41 | 4.96 | 0.00 | 3.67 |
| 12 | 3.81 | 4.08 | 3.24 | 3.99 | 4.08 | 3.10 | 3.17 | 3.15 | 4.24 | 3.67 | 3.67 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| 4 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| 5 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
| 6 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| 7 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| 8 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.63 |
| 9 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.56 |
| 10 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.61 |
| 11 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.59 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013