| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 305.1 | 300.4 | 226.8 | 208.8 | 142.6 | 71.8 | 71.0 | 55.6 | 50.7 | 28.9 | 19.1 |
| Cluster size | 407 | 401 | 283 | 297 | 200 | 98 | 91 | 77 | 75 | 53 | 18 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 6.60 | 6.82 | 7.02 | 6.95 | 7.26 | 5.92 | 6.79 | 3.89 | 4.00 | 4.22 | 4.09 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.21 | 2.47 | 2.95 | 2.53 | 2.28 | 3.97 | 4.66 | 4.01 | 5.19 |
| 2 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 2.39 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.21 | 4.27 | 4.76 | 4.30 | 5.30 |
| 3 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.63 | 2.81 | 2.03 | 4.49 | 4.81 | 4.68 | 5.32 |
| 4 | 2.47 | 2.39 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 2.57 | 2.16 | 4.44 | 4.63 | 4.65 | 4.98 |
| 5 | 2.95 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 2.67 | 4.87 | 5.04 | 5.05 | 5.46 |
| 6 | 2.53 | 2.63 | 2.81 | 2.57 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 3.44 | 3.68 | 3.85 | 4.16 |
| 7 | 2.28 | 2.21 | 2.03 | 2.16 | 2.67 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 4.29 | 4.57 | 4.49 | 5.08 |
| 8 | 3.97 | 4.27 | 4.49 | 4.44 | 4.87 | 3.44 | 4.29 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 2.49 | 3.06 |
| 9 | 4.66 | 4.76 | 4.81 | 4.63 | 5.04 | 3.68 | 4.57 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 1.82 |
| 10 | 4.01 | 4.30 | 4.68 | 4.65 | 5.05 | 3.85 | 4.49 | 2.49 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 3.74 |
| 11 | 5.19 | 5.30 | 5.32 | 4.98 | 5.46 | 4.16 | 5.08 | 3.06 | 1.82 | 3.74 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.78 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013