Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 221.2 | 213.1 | 191.3 | 165.6 | 161.6 | 149.0 | 128.7 | 97.1 | 93.2 | 79.7 | 77.3 | 68.1 |
Cluster size | 269 | 275 | 248 | 204 | 194 | 172 | 147 | 110 | 113 | 100 | 85 | 83 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.63 | 2.30 | 2.44 | 2.69 | 2.59 | 2.62 | 2.45 | 2.33 | 2.29 | 2.35 | 2.61 | 2.50 |
GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.34 | 1.88 | 1.77 | 2.67 | 1.98 | 2.76 | 3.08 | 2.10 | 2.46 | 2.84 |
2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 2.52 | 2.33 | 2.36 | 2.20 | 2.42 | 2.20 | 2.67 | 2.42 | 2.20 |
3 | 2.34 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.45 | 2.04 | 2.08 | 2.38 | 2.22 | 2.43 | 2.21 | 2.09 |
4 | 1.88 | 2.52 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.71 | 1.69 | 2.61 | 2.95 | 2.24 | 2.33 | 2.79 |
5 | 1.77 | 2.33 | 2.45 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 1.93 | 2.85 | 3.19 | 1.93 | 2.70 | 3.01 |
6 | 2.67 | 2.36 | 2.04 | 2.71 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 2.13 | 2.09 | 2.62 | 2.07 | 1.68 |
7 | 1.98 | 2.20 | 2.08 | 1.69 | 1.93 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.74 | 1.89 | 2.11 | 2.51 |
8 | 2.76 | 2.42 | 2.38 | 2.61 | 2.85 | 2.13 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.39 | 1.87 | 2.17 |
9 | 3.08 | 2.20 | 2.22 | 2.95 | 3.19 | 2.09 | 2.74 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 1.79 |
10 | 2.10 | 2.67 | 2.43 | 2.24 | 1.93 | 2.62 | 1.89 | 2.39 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.90 |
11 | 2.46 | 2.42 | 2.21 | 2.33 | 2.70 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 1.87 | 2.65 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.41 |
12 | 2.84 | 2.20 | 2.09 | 2.79 | 3.01 | 1.68 | 2.51 | 2.17 | 1.79 | 2.90 | 2.41 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.63 |
2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
4 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.66 |
5 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.63 |
6 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.81 |
7 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.66 |
8 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.71 |
9 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.76 |
10 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.65 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
12 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013