| Project Name | 16DN |
| Project Name | 16DN |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 172.7 | 117.7 | 111.6 | 109.3 | 104.1 | 103.2 | 101.8 | 91.8 | 59.7 | 44.0 | 34.6 | 26.8 |
| Cluster size | 345 | 169 | 269 | 224 | 232 | 142 | 200 | 131 | 63 | 97 | 84 | 44 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.93 | 4.50 | 2.98 | 4.69 | 3.53 | 2.69 | 4.49 | 2.68 | 3.58 | 4.51 | 3.55 | 3.45 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 3.73 | 1.70 | 4.30 | 4.49 | 1.32 | 5.02 | 6.11 | 1.90 | 2.61 | 5.11 |
| 2 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 1.62 | 3.70 | 3.94 | 1.10 | 4.71 | 5.99 | 1.80 | 2.29 | 4.89 |
| 3 | 3.73 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 1.46 | 1.23 | 3.21 | 2.33 | 3.68 | 3.01 | 1.75 | 2.67 |
| 4 | 1.70 | 1.62 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 3.97 | 4.44 | 1.67 | 5.06 | 6.15 | 2.34 | 2.81 | 5.22 |
| 5 | 4.30 | 3.70 | 1.46 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 3.89 | 2.80 | 3.74 | 3.77 | 2.23 | 2.97 |
| 6 | 4.49 | 3.94 | 1.23 | 4.44 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 3.92 | 1.53 | 3.25 | 3.61 | 2.47 | 2.15 |
| 7 | 1.32 | 1.10 | 3.21 | 1.67 | 3.89 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 4.73 | 6.06 | 1.61 | 2.24 | 4.99 |
| 8 | 5.02 | 4.71 | 2.33 | 5.06 | 2.80 | 1.53 | 4.73 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 4.37 | 3.57 | 1.53 |
| 9 | 6.11 | 5.99 | 3.68 | 6.15 | 3.74 | 3.25 | 6.06 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 5.64 | 5.21 | 2.42 |
| 10 | 1.90 | 1.80 | 3.01 | 2.34 | 3.77 | 3.61 | 1.61 | 4.37 | 5.64 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 4.31 |
| 11 | 2.61 | 2.29 | 1.75 | 2.81 | 2.23 | 2.47 | 2.24 | 3.57 | 5.21 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 3.98 |
| 12 | 5.11 | 4.89 | 2.67 | 5.22 | 2.97 | 2.15 | 4.99 | 1.53 | 2.42 | 4.31 | 3.98 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.65 |
| 2 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.78 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 5 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.93 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
| 7 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.90 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.83 |
| 10 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.68 |
| 11 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013