| Project Name | 16c |
| Project Name | 16c |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 154.5 | 131.5 | 129.3 | 105.3 | 103.1 | 99.5 | 83.0 | 75.4 | 57.7 | 51.6 | 41.4 | 38.8 |
| Cluster size | 309 | 236 | 207 | 165 | 202 | 164 | 173 | 123 | 123 | 126 | 91 | 81 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.97 | 4.24 | 5.16 | 5.04 | 4.96 | 5.30 | 4.93 | 4.07 | 5.07 | 5.02 | 4.92 | 5.07 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 4.41 | 1.96 | 2.27 | 4.36 | 2.05 | 1.95 | 3.65 | 2.13 | 4.41 | 3.70 |
| 2 | 4.05 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 4.20 | 2.96 | 2.36 | 2.75 | 4.77 | 2.75 | 2.77 | 2.62 | 2.91 |
| 3 | 4.41 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 3.84 | 3.03 | 1.29 | 3.35 | 5.01 | 4.10 | 2.99 | 2.10 | 4.33 |
| 4 | 1.96 | 4.20 | 3.84 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 3.76 | 2.41 | 2.06 | 4.22 | 2.24 | 4.10 | 4.39 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 2.96 | 3.03 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 1.15 | 2.83 | 3.43 | 1.02 | 3.20 | 3.52 |
| 6 | 4.36 | 2.36 | 1.29 | 3.76 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 5.02 | 3.66 | 3.02 | 2.20 | 3.95 |
| 7 | 2.05 | 2.75 | 3.35 | 2.41 | 1.15 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 2.89 | 0.93 | 3.39 | 3.02 |
| 8 | 1.95 | 4.77 | 5.01 | 2.06 | 2.83 | 5.02 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 4.44 | 2.82 | 4.96 | 4.51 |
| 9 | 3.65 | 2.75 | 4.10 | 4.22 | 3.43 | 3.66 | 2.89 | 4.44 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 3.19 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 2.13 | 2.77 | 2.99 | 2.24 | 1.02 | 3.02 | 0.93 | 2.82 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 3.14 |
| 11 | 4.41 | 2.62 | 2.10 | 4.10 | 3.20 | 2.20 | 3.39 | 4.96 | 3.19 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 3.33 |
| 12 | 3.70 | 2.91 | 4.33 | 4.39 | 3.52 | 3.95 | 3.02 | 4.51 | 0.72 | 3.14 | 3.33 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| 2 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.68 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.94 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.68 | 0.83 |
| 8 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.62 |
| 9 | 0.65 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.97 | 0.64 | 0.93 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.80 |
| 11 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013