| Project Name | 28ISMinimized |
| Project Name | 28ISMinimized |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 339.2 | 181.5 | 134.8 | 102.6 | 101.1 | 85.7 | 82.9 | 82.2 | 76.1 | 63.2 | 61.7 | 60.8 |
| Cluster size | 306 | 283 | 231 | 142 | 108 | 153 | 132 | 163 | 139 | 117 | 115 | 111 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.53 | 5.32 | 4.25 | 1.94 | 1.51 | 5.54 | 2.36 | 6.95 | 5.86 | 5.31 | 4.47 | 3.45 |
| GDT_TS | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.36 | 3.67 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 5.20 | 1.60 | 6.44 | 5.42 | 4.87 | 4.03 | 2.87 |
| 2 | 4.36 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 4.23 | 4.68 | 4.36 | 3.82 | 5.14 | 4.32 | 4.66 | 3.01 | 3.10 |
| 3 | 3.67 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 3.43 | 4.17 | 2.71 | 3.88 | 3.99 | 3.01 | 3.05 | 4.35 | 2.80 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 4.23 | 3.43 | 0.00 | 1.09 | 4.91 | 1.56 | 6.16 | 5.16 | 4.53 | 3.83 | 2.92 |
| 5 | 0.90 | 4.68 | 4.17 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 5.46 | 1.52 | 6.71 | 5.76 | 5.05 | 3.89 | 3.22 |
| 6 | 5.20 | 4.36 | 2.71 | 4.91 | 5.46 | 0.00 | 5.10 | 2.64 | 1.45 | 1.84 | 3.91 | 4.42 |
| 7 | 1.60 | 3.82 | 3.88 | 1.56 | 1.52 | 5.10 | 0.00 | 6.21 | 5.27 | 4.83 | 3.24 | 3.17 |
| 8 | 6.44 | 5.14 | 3.99 | 6.16 | 6.71 | 2.64 | 6.21 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.58 | 4.67 | 5.45 |
| 9 | 5.42 | 4.32 | 3.01 | 5.16 | 5.76 | 1.45 | 5.27 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 4.03 | 4.63 |
| 10 | 4.87 | 4.66 | 3.05 | 4.53 | 5.05 | 1.84 | 4.83 | 2.58 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 4.34 |
| 11 | 4.03 | 3.01 | 4.35 | 3.83 | 3.89 | 3.91 | 3.24 | 4.67 | 4.03 | 3.30 | 0.00 | 3.83 |
| 12 | 2.87 | 3.10 | 2.80 | 2.92 | 3.22 | 4.42 | 3.17 | 5.45 | 4.63 | 4.34 | 3.83 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.86 |
| 2 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.84 |
| 3 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| 4 | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.83 |
| 5 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| 12 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013