| Project Name | DR-54 |
| Project Name | DR-54 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 81.0 | 79.8 | 65.6 | 61.5 | 61.4 | 56.2 | 53.2 | 48.4 | 48.1 | 39.9 | 34.2 | 30.2 |
| Cluster size | 223 | 267 | 151 | 148 | 178 | 211 | 159 | 155 | 173 | 141 | 100 | 94 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.8 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.73 | 2.80 | 4.68 | 4.24 | 4.80 | 4.45 | 5.97 | 4.38 | 4.75 | 5.16 | 3.75 | 6.80 |
| GDT_TS | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.58 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.86 | 4.19 | 4.31 | 1.36 | 5.12 | 4.13 | 4.19 | 4.80 | 2.95 | 2.43 | 5.51 |
| 2 | 4.86 | 0.00 | 4.67 | 4.19 | 5.15 | 4.42 | 5.24 | 4.17 | 4.11 | 4.75 | 3.78 | 6.92 |
| 3 | 4.19 | 4.67 | 0.00 | 1.22 | 4.51 | 3.73 | 3.57 | 2.46 | 2.66 | 4.77 | 4.67 | 5.05 |
| 4 | 4.31 | 4.19 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 3.85 | 3.98 | 2.54 | 2.49 | 5.04 | 4.55 | 5.57 |
| 5 | 1.36 | 5.15 | 4.51 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 5.05 | 4.40 | 4.56 | 5.15 | 2.95 | 2.79 | 5.05 |
| 6 | 5.12 | 4.42 | 3.73 | 3.85 | 5.05 | 0.00 | 5.67 | 3.43 | 3.35 | 4.99 | 5.21 | 4.11 |
| 7 | 4.13 | 5.24 | 3.57 | 3.98 | 4.40 | 5.67 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 4.01 | 4.90 | 5.77 | 4.61 |
| 8 | 4.19 | 4.17 | 2.46 | 2.54 | 4.56 | 3.43 | 3.56 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 4.98 | 4.75 | 4.59 |
| 9 | 4.80 | 4.11 | 2.66 | 2.49 | 5.15 | 3.35 | 4.01 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 4.52 | 5.05 | 5.38 |
| 10 | 2.95 | 4.75 | 4.77 | 5.04 | 2.95 | 4.99 | 4.90 | 4.98 | 4.52 | 0.00 | 3.59 | 5.76 |
| 11 | 2.43 | 3.78 | 4.67 | 4.55 | 2.79 | 5.21 | 5.77 | 4.75 | 5.05 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 6.62 |
| 12 | 5.51 | 6.92 | 5.05 | 5.57 | 5.05 | 4.11 | 4.61 | 4.59 | 5.38 | 5.76 | 6.62 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.93 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.71 |
| 5 | 0.93 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.61 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.82 |
| 8 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.58 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.61 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013