Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 192.9 | 176.8 | 166.1 | 162.1 | 155.9 | 126.2 | 120.2 | 98.6 | 96.5 | 90.0 | 86.9 | 76.2 |
Cluster size | 216 | 237 | 220 | 220 | 212 | 160 | 162 | 118 | 120 | 113 | 119 | 103 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.56 | 2.42 | 2.56 | 2.36 | 2.17 | 2.56 | 2.43 | 2.41 | 2.34 | 2.79 | 2.29 | 2.34 |
GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 1.87 | 1.71 | 1.97 | 2.33 | 2.14 | 2.13 | 1.76 | 2.24 | 1.88 | 2.20 |
2 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 1.87 | 2.11 | 2.10 | 2.04 | 2.44 | 1.86 | 2.23 | 2.09 | 2.05 |
3 | 1.87 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 2.09 | 1.83 | 2.21 | 2.16 | 1.94 | 1.95 | 2.19 | 1.92 |
4 | 1.71 | 1.87 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 1.79 | 1.68 | 1.88 | 1.44 | 2.10 | 1.71 | 1.85 |
5 | 1.97 | 2.11 | 2.09 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 1.82 | 1.66 | 1.73 | 2.22 | 1.48 | 1.84 |
6 | 2.33 | 2.10 | 1.83 | 1.79 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.18 | 1.83 | 1.94 | 2.15 | 2.02 |
7 | 2.14 | 2.04 | 2.21 | 1.68 | 1.82 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 1.93 | 2.36 | 1.67 | 1.94 |
8 | 2.13 | 2.44 | 2.16 | 1.88 | 1.66 | 2.18 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.48 | 1.70 | 1.93 |
9 | 1.76 | 1.86 | 1.94 | 1.44 | 1.73 | 1.83 | 1.93 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 1.91 | 2.05 |
10 | 2.24 | 2.23 | 1.95 | 2.10 | 2.22 | 1.94 | 2.36 | 2.48 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.14 |
11 | 1.88 | 2.09 | 2.19 | 1.71 | 1.48 | 2.15 | 1.67 | 1.70 | 1.91 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
12 | 2.20 | 2.05 | 1.92 | 1.85 | 1.84 | 2.02 | 1.94 | 1.93 | 2.05 | 2.14 | 1.95 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
3 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.79 |
4 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
5 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
6 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
7 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.79 |
8 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
9 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
11 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.79 |
12 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013